NASA Climate Scamming Is Happening Everywhere

The fraudsters at NASA are back at again telling people that the Arctic got greener from 1984-2012 due to climate change which is happening everywhere.
   2016-06-07 05 55 54

Global warming melting Arctic regions, climate change is happening everywhere

They picked 1984 as the start date because it was a very cold period near the bottom of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO.) The Arctic and the rest of the world warmed cyclically since 1984 – just as it did from 1910 to 1940.

2016-06-07 05 51 31

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

The cyclical warming is particularly clear in the Arctic.

station (1)

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis


Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

In 1947, scientists reported that the Arctic had warmed 10 degrees.


31 May 1947 – Danger Seen In Mysterious Warning Of Arctic Climate

So how does NASA deal with past Arctic warming?  They simply erase it.



From: Tom Wigley <>
To: Phil Jones <>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <>

So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC,
then this would be significant for the global mean — but
we’d still have to explain the land blip.

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

Make no mistake about it, this is the biggest scam in science history.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to NASA Climate Scamming Is Happening Everywhere

  1. AndyG55 says:

    Arctic temperatures…… Not going anywhere.

    UAH NoPol temps this century before the 2016 El Nino transient

  2. AndyG55 says:

    Some Arctic temperature station.. REAL, not GISS adjusted.

  3. AndyG55 says:

    Eight stations in Iceland.. according to Iceland Met.

    We know what GISS tries to do with them… DATA FRAUD. !!!

  4. AndyG55 says:

    REAL Reykjavik temperatures overlaid on AMO

  5. AndyG55 says:

    NH sea ice levels flipped and overlaid on AMO

  6. AndyG55 says:

    Our current position on the AMO (blue dot), and the period the NH temperature anomaly is based on (blue shaded)

    • Winnipeg Boy says:

      Excellent Work.
      If we could just get a reporter to do 10 minutes of research and slip a story by his mainstream media bosses….
      Where are the bloody internal whistle blowers?

      • DrSandman says:

        Well, any of us that didn’t already hew the line were forced out or never hired to begin with. I left the cesspool of academia long ago, and I can’t imagine going back.

      • rw says:

        Ted Cruz and others in Congress should work on cultivating sources – just as McCarthy appears to have done.

  7. Cam says:

    Landsat 5 was not launched until 1984. Previous models of Landsats (with the exception of 4 which lost 50% of its capability right after launch) didn’t have the Thematic Mapper which is what they used to determine the greening of the northern regions. They didn’t purposely choose 1984 because it was the coldest. It just happened that way because of the satellite capability.

    • Andy DC says:

      We had a good number of weather stations in the Arctic going back long before 1984. If there had been any significant long term warming, don’t you think the thermometers would have caught it? A cherry pick is still a cherry pick.

      • AndyG55 says:

        The Iceland Met guys have been taking readings for a long time

        I have posted graphs in the first few posts on this thread.

        If you start your data , be it Arctic sea ice, temperature etc, at the very bottom of the AMO cycle, ..

        then of course sea ice deceases and temperature increases.

        But these have both levelled off since the AMO reached the top of its cycle.

        Arctic sea ice levels are behaving EXACTLY as you expect them to in accordance to the AMO and the end of the recovery from the LIA.

    • tonyheller says:

      And they simply forget to mention that they were being intentionally misleading and intentionally propagating junk science.

  8. Ben Vorlich says:

    It’s interesting that Paris has just had the worst “flooding” for 30 years (1980s) and Australia the worst storms for 30 years. Or according to the BBC they have.

    • wert says:

      198 countries did not have the worst storms for 30 years, one did. 27 cities bigger than Paris did not have the worst 30 year flood.

      You take 30 places, for each type of weather extreme you are expected to get a 30 year worst at each year. No news there.

  9. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    They picked 1984 as the start date because it was a very cold period near the bottom of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO.)

    Also notice the IPCC chose 1906 for the start of their magic century…also right at the bottom of the AMO.

    So half of the “warming” last century is an artefact. Why did they choose 1906 not 1880 when both GISS and HadCRUT go back that far? Inquiring minds would like to know the answer.

  10. AndrewS says:

    I don’t know how out of the ordinary this is for June 8, but Cotopaxi, in Ecuador, has gotten a fresh coat of snow in the last day or so. This could be indicative of an increase in the temperature gradient(colder at higher altitudes.) The Ski resorts in Argentina have also opened weeks early.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.