NASA : If The Trend Is Going The Wrong Way, Simply Change The Data

In 1999, NASA’s James Hansen was troubled that his global warming theory was failing and the US was cooling.

Whither U.S. Climate?

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s “Grapes of Wrath”

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

Troublesome data is no problem for NASA. They simply alter the data to produce the result they want, and then scream that they are being harassed when called out for their fraud.

2000 Version archived by John Daly   2017 Version

In cooperation with NOAA, NASA simply cooled the past to make the post-1930 cooling go away.

NOAA knows perfectly well that the US is not warming.

U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend –

It is essential that the criminals behind this scam are called out and removed from government. This is the biggest fraud in science history.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to NASA : If The Trend Is Going The Wrong Way, Simply Change The Data

  1. Andy DC says:

    To deliberately falsify data by a Government official should be a serious crime.

    • Oliver K. Manuel says:

      My research mentor apparently knew that federal research agencies, CDC, DOE, EPA, NASA, NOAA, etc., etc. falsified data after nations and national academies of sciences were united under the UN on 24 OCT 1945 “to save the world from nuclear annihilation” by hiding the source of energy in atomic bombs:

      The US NAS (National Academy of Sciences) apparently used control of annual budget review of federal research agencies for Congress to direct this charade of consensus science” acknowledged by the Swedish and Norwegian NAS’s with Nobel & Crafoord Prizes!

      May Donald Trump have the courage and wisdom to end deception of the public by the post-WWII alliance of the UN with the US NAS!

    • CheshireRed says:

      It’s now well-past time these guys were held to account for their conduct. Sack the individuals responsible for the fraud from NOAA & NASA/GISS and get them charged. Their arrogance in civil life will be no preparation for when the FBI want to have a ‘debate’ with them. Try your ‘debate is over’ stance with those guys and there’ll be on mop & bucket detail in the state pen in no time.

      The US system of plea bargaining isn’t perfect but a major benefit is it DOES get the guilty ones talking. ’30 years if you keep quiet or perhaps 5 if you spill the beans – your choice, mate’, may focus some minds. Let’s see how these arrogant clowns deal with the FBI wiping the smirk off their faces. They’re not hardened crim’s so will be squealing like stuck pigs in no time and when they do, there will be consequences.

  2. cary says:

    I wonder since we have a change of authority in Washington we could get a FOIA request approved for Gavin’s correspondence. And while at it get the EPA to actually release there scientific data for making CO2 a pollutant.

  3. John Niclasen says:

    Changing color to blue, changing to same scale, and putting the new “U.S. Temperature” on top of the old one gives the shown graph.



    Same picture as always. Lowering historic temperatures and raising recent ones.

    • John Niclasen says:

      Same with the “Global Temperature”. Especialle the years 1900-1940 are colder in the recent blue graph.

      You guys need to clean up. This influence a lot of people all over the world, and very much here in Denmark.

      • Stewart Pid says:

        It sure would be interesting to know every station that is in the world data and to do an audit of the station quality and look at offsets to determine if they cherry picked the urban stations etc to get that abrupt post 1978 warming. I know if u look at John Daly’s old site (still up last I looked) u don’t see this jump.
        Hopefully this scam / crime of the century is coming to a close.

  4. Don B says:

    Einstein: If the facts don’t support the theory, change the facts.

    NOAA and GISS don’t know he was joking.

  5. Eric Simpson says:

    Outstanding post, Tony!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *