Earth is the same temperature as 25 years ago. All temperature variations since then are artifacts of El Nino and volcanic eruptions.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
Global warming is the biggest fraud in science history. The Earth is not warming.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
Global Warming/Climate Change is mostly Fake News/Bullshit
There was a sudden change in the baseline in 1997. Why did that happen? There is no reasonable explanation – other than calculation methods or weighting methods were changed in that year. That change has the same influence as a determinate error.
what happen in 1997 was to con the world so they sign the 1997 Kyoto climate protocol
Doesn’t matter. People will still see that as ‘the pause buster’.
La Nina is already underway and will deliver cooling from now on for at least a year. That means a 20 year Pause is now a certainty, which also means the entirety of human emissions of the last 18 years have counted for precisely nothing. Literally no impact on global temperatures. Given the value alarmists place on CO2 that’s an absolute hammer blow to their theory. The green blob will be absolutely furious.
PS. This will unfold during Trumps policy-forming formative years. Oh dear oh dear, green blobbers. Whatya gonna do?
Exactly what green blobbers always do:
Double-down on the lies.
There being none more skilled at lying than those psychopaths of the fascist Left, who, for two-hundred and forty years already, have made their livings breeding and creating and cultivating their sociopathic and simpleton base. Too damned not a typo dumb to know its being lied to and/or too darned mean-spirited and/or greedy, to care.
I would be very cautious towards the temperature measurements from satellites since a couple of years ago, they look like they began to be doctored as well.
This is bad news. Looks like the promised warming from increased CO2 will never materialize. We’ll just have to be happy with increased crop and forest yields. Bummer.
PAUSE / HIATUS is the biggest trick the Warmist pulled on the most ignorant fakes… 2] by saying that; ”no warming for 15y, for 17y and 3 months” = they made the maggots to advertise that the PHONY GLOBAL WARMING EXIST. Same as Santa is got a PAUSE / HIATUS between January and December. VERDICT; the maggots still prospering on the carcass called ”western democracy” gave victory to the extremist Warmist; by promoting the the NON-EXISTENT GLOBAL WARMING exist, but is got a PAUSE – and you public know that no PAUSE is forever, when the stupid PAUSE is over, only the Warmist mafia can save you… = the biggest criminals in the new millennia are the PAUSE MAGGOTS…
Are you taking medication?
If yes, which one?
You make no sense.
For all the alleged catastrophe that is Global Warming; there doesn’t appear to be much actual Global Warming…
Get your head out of the graphs and look around you people. Oceans are rising at a rapidly accelerating pace with many coastal communities experiencing sunny day floods. Arctic Ice and Mountain glaciers are disappearing at many times the rate of normal cycles. Average Ice-out on lakes in NA is 3 weeks sooner than preindustrial levels and getting to the point where some lakes barely freeze over. This is unprecedented. Extreme weather events are 50 to 1oo% more common than even 30 years ago. Ocean acidification is killing off all the major reef systems in the world while species extinction is ten times normal background levels. Does the world need to literally be burning around you before you get your collective heads out of the sand?
Utter nonsense. You are parroting propaganda with no basis.
What a load of total and utter BULLSHIT
Oceans sea levels are NOT accelerating
Arctice sea ice is nmore than it was for the same day last year.
Greenland ice mass is growing rapidly
Ocean acidification is a total LIE.
Mann.. you Seriously have been SUCKLED IN by the alrarmista propaganda BULLSHIT haven’t you.
I DARE you to try to back up any of your MORONIC claims with actual data. !!!
Come on Scott.. you will get REAMED. !!
Perhaps that is what you want.
AndyG, I just did the reaming, not that Scotty-poo is capable of actually reading and understanding scientific studies.
Did I predict that the green blobbers would double-down on the lies, or did I predict that they’d double-down on the lies?
Case proven.
VALIDATION BY ALTERNATE STUDIES
GLACIAL ADVANCE
STUDY #7
Ice free Arctic Ocean, an Early Holocene analogue
STUDY #8
Temperature and precipitation history of the Arctic
STUDY #9
A new approach for reconstructing glacier variability based on lake sediments recording input from more than one glacier January 2012
The highest glacier growth started 600 years ago prior to that most glaciers had melted away.
THIRD METHOD OF VALIDATION
STUDY #10
Sea Level Changes Past Records and Future Expectations
Sorry, these got stuck under the wrong comment. Meant to go under Scotty-poo’s.
Scott Vlaun you are full of Bovine Feces.
TEN PEER-REVIEWED PAPERS PROVING SEA LEVEL IS NOT RISING
and why the WIKI sea level graph is wrong.
STUDY #1
Mid to late Holocene sea-level reconstruction of Southeast Vietnam using beachrock and beach-ridge deposits
Translation the sea level was up to 1.5 meters higher than today in a tectonically stable area ~5000 years ago to 2000 years ago. Tectonically stable area refers to areas devoid of deformation such as all processes which modify the external form of the crust. For example unidirectional vertical movements, plate tectonics and also the rise and fall of the solid earth surface, especially in coastal areas, caused by external factors such as climate change (gio-isotasy, hydro-isotasy)
STUDY #2
Sea-level highstand recorded in Holocene shoreline deposits on Oahu, Hawaii
This study shows a sea level highstand ~1.6 meter above the present level from ~5500 years ago to 2000 years ago.
STUDY #3
Late Quaternary highstand deposits of the southern Arabian Gulf: a record of sea-level and climate change
This study shows a sea level highstand ~1 to 2 meters above the present level about ~5500 years ago.
STUDY #4
The Quaternary Geological History of the Santa Catarina Southeastern Region (Brazil) 1999
The first part discusses drilling in several locations and analyzing samples. They mention dating prior to that was guesses. “…. A drilling campaign done in the domain permitted the sampling of material for 14C datings, and the obtained data confirmed some previously assumed ages. The sequence of events, that originated the Holocene deposits, has been also reconstructed through drilling and 14C dating of the collected peat and shell samples…”
In the body of the text is this:
This study shows a sea level highstand ~ 4 meters above the present level about ~5000 years ago. With sea level oscillating since then. Not only has the sea levels have dropped since the Holocene Optimum the evidence shows that “warmer paleotemperatures were favourable for great proliferation of mollusks in the area”
Santa Catarina Brazil is at latitude 27.2500°S and is tectonically stable.
STUDY #5
Holocene sea-level change and ice-sheet history in the Vestfold Hills, East Antarctica
The above is a RELATIVE sea level. The area is not tectonically stable because the area has isostatic uplift in response to deglaciation from the Wisconsin Ice Age. The same applies to the following study.
STUDY #6
A new Holocene relative sea level curve for the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica
Have the ClimAstrologists corrected for the 18.6-yearly Luna Nodal cycle?
Linear trend lines on sinusoidal curves are very time dependent. The Dutch who are the most concerned about actual sea level rise have found the cycle.
The Effect of the 18.6-Year Lunar Nodal Cycle on Regional Sea-Level Rise Estimates
Fedor Baart†,‡, Pieter H. A. J. M. van Gelder†, John de Ronde†,‡, Mark van Koningsveld†,§, and Bert Wouters†
(wwwDOT)bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00169.1
Linear trend lines on sinusoidal curves are very time dependent.
“Cooling…German Springs Arriving 20 Days Later Than 28 Years Ago!”
http://notrickszone.com/2015/05/31/cooling-german-springs-arriving-20-days-later-than-25-years-ago/
Darn good read for those interested in such matters. And another example of official government lies.
And another study:
AND another New 2015 paper: Ocean impact on decadal Atlantic climate variability revealed by sea-level observations
he area where Roman sea ports are inland is tectonically stable according to NASA.
List of Roman Sea Ports found inland
(Has great pictures and maps.)
For the areas occupied by the Romans it was pretty close to zero or actually sinking! “..the pivot point is rather abrupt; Scotland is still rising due to the rebound effect which is correspondingly sinking England 2 millimetres into the North Sea each year.”
https://i0.wp.com/basementgeographer.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/PGR_Paulson07_big.jpg
FINALLY the misleading WIKI Sea Level Graph
This is a critical study because it is the one that yanks the WIKI sea level chart (adjusted of course) from a falling sea level to a slowly rising sea level. Note that the study authors find a falling sea level and can’t believe it because it doesn’t meet ‘expectations’ (The area is tectonically stable and unglaciated so there is ZERO need for adjustments.)
The infamous graph:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/Holocene_Sea_Level.png
Santa Catarina is the dark red cross above the pack on the right. Remove it and sea level is actually falling for the last 2,000 years.
The Quaternary Geological History of the Santa Catarina Southeastern Region (Brazil) 1999
The first part discusses drilling in several locations and analyzing samples. They mention dating prior to that was guesses. “…. A drilling campaign done in the domain permitted the sampling of material for 14C datings, and the obtained data confirmed some previously assumed ages. The sequence of events, that originated the Holocene deposits, has been also reconstructed through drilling and 14C dating of the collected peat and shell samples…”
In the body of the text is this:
“…a relative sea-level change curve for the last 7 ky in the area Florianópolis-Jaguaruna (Fig. 7) is outlined…”
https://i0.wp.com/www.scielo.br/img/fbpe/aabc/v72n2/0025img17.gif
This study shows a sea level highstand ~ 4 meters above the present level about ~5000 years ago. With sea level oscillating since then. Not only has the sea levels dropped since the Holocene Optimum the evidence shows that “warmer paleotemperatures were favourable for great proliferation of mollusks in the area” (Santa Catarina Brazil is at latitude 27.2500°S. )
*******************************************
Back to the NASA study on post-glacial rebound.
AGAIN – Notice the pivot point in the UK is ~ 55° N and the great lakes ~ 45° N which is one of the reasons why Southeast Vietnam ~10°N, the southern Arabian Gulf, ~ 23°N, and Santa Catarina, Brazil, 27° S are tectonically stable areas.
“A NASA model of current surface elevation change due to post-glacial rebound and the reloading of sea basins with water. Canada, Northern Europe, and Antarctica are all currently rebounding at a rate of a few millimetres per year. More water in the oceans as a result of ice sheet melting is slowly depressing sea basins. Satellites are used to observe differences over time.”
Ocean acidification is chemically impossible because the oceans are sitting on rock that BUFFERS the CO2.
Technical paper: Chemical Laws for Distribution of CO2 in Nature
Ocean ‘Acidification’ Scare Debunked from a Geochemical Perspective
The chemistry of ocean pH and “acidification”
Oceans not acidifying – “scientists” hid 80 years of pH data
Sorry, you are misinformed by warmist blogs. Ocean acidification has been completely debunked more than once. There is no acceleration in sea level rise. Although that did occur back in the 1990s, it has been cancelled out by a slowing down since such that the average rise is the same as it has been for 3 centuries. There is no increase in the frequency or severity of extreme weather events, and even the IPCC acknowledge that in their last report, AR5. Glaciers are exhibiting normal cyclical changes. The few photos of glaciers taken in the early days of photography show them retreated as much as they are now. Coming back to today, since the end of the El Nino, northern hemisphere temperature has dropped rapidly, and now has a record level of ice and snow cover. Global mean temperature is at this moment the same as it was in 1985.
While artic sea ice extent has decreased by -1 million Sq km versus the 1981 to 2010 average the antarctic sea ice extent has increased by more than 1.3 million Sq km versus it’s average. In addition the antarctic land ice thickness is at all time record high. Careful looking at just the propaganda.
Oceans are rising at a rapidly accelerating pace with many coastal communities experiencing sunny day floods.
Please provide actual events, regerences and web links. Note- Huffington Post articles do not count.
If it’s as prevalent as you assert, there should be hundreds of references, and then no prior history of flooding. Don’t tell me to Google-it, either.
Bill, if you are looking for evidence that “Oceans are rising at a rapidly accelerating pace”, the NOAA tide gauge page is a good place to start. Maybe you can spot the year that fossil fuel CO2 started increasing the rise rate:
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8518750
Scott,
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
More warmist stupidity,where even when Tony shows a 100% data based chart from Satellite showing no warming from 1998 to 2016. The IPCC in EVERY report say it was supposed to warm at LEAST .20C per decade,with .30C being the average warming rate per decade.
From the 1990 IPCC report,
“Based on current model results, we predict:
• under the IPCC Business-as-Usual (Scenario A) emissions of greenhouse gases, a rate of increase of global mean temperature during the next century of about 0 3°C per decade (with an uncertainty range of 0 2°C to 0 5°C per decade), this is greater than that seen over the past 10,000 years This will result in a likely increase in global mean temperature of about 1°C above the present value by 2025 and VC
before the end of the next century”
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/far/wg_I/ipcc_far_wg_I_spm.pdf
But it is ZERO rate since the 1990’s,which means you are full of baloney.
Meanwhile not only have you failed to counter that valid chart,you also failed to make a data based counterpoint to Tony;s post,just the usual brainless warmist babble is all you have here.
This is why realists laugh at you.
RSS anomalies are now available.. third decimal place stuff.. so NO WARMING SINCE 1998
2016… 0.559
1998… 0.550
Looking just at December data….
In RSS December 2016 is NINTH place (1987 was one of the warmer Decembers)
IN UAH December 2016 is in =5th place (1987 ditto)
Big drops in USA since November for both RSS (-3.1ºC) and UAH USA48 (-1.85ºC)
“Global warming is the biggest fraud in science history.”
I know you alarmists don’t like Tony saying it but this is a testable hypothesis. All you have to do is find a bigger fraud.
Good luck with that, comrades.
Snigger….
As if by magic our old friend Dana Nutty pipes up in the Guardian about the ‘return of the hiatus / pause’.
He is of course predicting such claims precisely because he knows they’re coming very soon. El Nino is over, the cooling la Nina now in place, nothing on the horizon to offer any ‘global warming’ and on top of all that Trump will be coming into office to drain the climate swamp just as global temperatures really do start to revert from the El Nino high and will thus show as cooling. Not so much a pincer movement as a complete rout is coming his way, and he knows it.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/jan/06/prepare-for-reanimation-of-the-zombie-myth-no-global-warming-since-2016
Watch for the newest OH! Look a SQUIRREL! To take attention away from the fading CAGW scare.
They had the ‘Russians Are Coming’ —err cracking— scare all lined up and then Trump won…
Some posting peer review perporting to show no sea level rise consider this, the global temp is going to go beyond 4 degrees, It’s up 1 . something already We don’t really know if anything we do now will stop it due to lag time in climate and the gigatons of methane releasing from the thawing in Siberia. feedback loops and the fact that the Human race is a heat engine spell doom unless we unite to send a stronger louder message to the 1% today More solutions 1: orbiting shades, 2: action group at http://localgroup.weebly.com/
Utter nonsense at all levels
You really do have to wonder what some of these twerps are taking.
Is there a new form of highly brain-damaging, hallucinogenic drug on the market, which they are adding to their Klimate Kool-Aide.???
Alexander,
The warming rate since 1979,by Satellite is less than half the projected PER DECADE rate as published by the IPCC,which is .30C per decade,while Satellite shows about .12C per decade.
CH4 is a negligible GHG,since its main absorption bands are in the LOW energy part of the IR,well away from the main IR outflow from the planets surface. You have showing your vapid ignorance here since even few warmist scientists that exist,knows that Methane is short lived in the atmosphere,that it is a trivial absorber of IR. They know that most leftists like you are going to too ignorant to realize you are being fooled by their CH4 mania.
The much talked about but never seen Positive Feedback loop never goes away,since it is a warmist fantasy that needs to be held onto since all of their few short term modeling fantasies have already failed. Something that have NEVER happened in the last 1,000,000,000 years.
For most of Earth history,CO2 levels in the atmosphere was at least above 1500 ppm,at times over 3000 ppm,with ZERO evidence of serious warming catastrophe you leftist eco loony brain dead morons keep babbling about. The current CO2 rate will reach around 550 ppm by 2100.
The basic Logarithmic CO2 warm forcing rate is nearly done at the 400 ppm level,which means very little future warming from CO2 can occur,according to this link,
http://joannenova.com.au/globalwarming/graphs/log-co2/log-graph-lindzen-choi-web.gif
You are so whacked with baloney……
Alexander, are you by chance the same guy who was explaining some decades ago at the west end of the Pearl Street Mall how the Earth’s overlords developed the human race directly from anapsids after they exploded the Siberian Traps and killed almost everyone else? And do you remember asking tourists passing by to touch your temples as evidence?
You are now entering…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8GwT7ZotCg
I sold some of the most sensitive laborstory and filed instruments for measuring do-called greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, NO2) and isotopic analysers to resesrchers around the world.
Nice prople in genral but it was a religion to them, and my Dad told me ask a kid to never argue religion with somebody who you didn’t want as an enemy.
Trying to discuss that H2O is a larger IR absorber or did rsising temps from solar activity cause CO2 solubility to drcresase in the oceams and go into the atmosphere was like asking a Muslim how a horse flew into the sky or a Mormon why they wear special underwesr. It will not get you anywhere- because tgat’s what they believe as a matter of faith.
Of course these are only local New England data:
https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2005/3002/
If you wanted credibility, your graphs you are posting would actually have a legend and some descriptors as to what people are looking at. I just laugh when you folks want to prove a point with graphs, but yet fail to enlighten us to what the graph even is showing. And then I laugh further when commenters comment on a graph without even being able to know what the graph is showing.
Thanks for the good laughs.
Moron alert
Agree with you Tony, the brainless dweeb fails to notice the LINKS just below the charts, you have placed there,that explains it all.
He would also be completely incapable of using the site even if he did manage to figure out the links.
Here’s a screenshot. it’s the tropospheric mean…of what? and what is the source of the data. if you folks would actually want to have a decent conversation, i’d play along.
Are you really say that you don’t know what RSS is?
Seriously ???????
Do you really know THAT LITTLE about climate data?
Or what MSU is?
Oh dear… that really is the depths of ignorance.
Did you know that RSS had a ZERO trend from 1997 to 2015 just before the El Nino transient, and that the transient has now decayed to just below that trend line?
Mark wants to play along! Let’s play his favorite game.
I see that Mark,wants to convince us on how stupid he is.
From the link that answers all your questions,it was right above the charts you are so easily flummoxed over.:
http://www.woodfortrees.org/examples
Mark, here is another link you manage to miss,that explains the data and source of the data:
http://www.woodfortrees.org/credits
I forgot to post the instructions for playing with Mark:
Display his scientific comments on one screen, aim the camera at your face and click the above game link on a second screen.
That’s a real educated response.
You are the one desperately short of education.
If you don’t recognise basic graphs to do with climate and the WFT source, and don’t know what RSS, etc are.
…. then you really do need to go and ask your climate asylum handlers.
And know, we don’t Tony to tell us you are a moron.. its obvious from your post
Done laughing? Good. Now, what did you learn from the links?
Great. When you are done laughing, Mark, look at the underlying data and descriptions in the links. Come back to explain what you did and didn’t understand. Bring friends.
Don’t insult the poor donkeys. The donkeys are a lot smarter and much more trainable.
No they are Mark,Scott and Alexander,but who is the fourth one?
GRIFF!!!!
We left out Snowflake errr Snow White errr transvestive Jimmyboy Hunt. He is in the back getting kicked.
Their also a whole lot friendlier and entertaining to be around. Yep! I much prefer REAL Jackasses to the kind found on the internet, in the news media, in politics, in business, on the road, etc. etc. etc.
“I just laugh….. ”
Almost certainly just moronic, inane, giggling in self-gratification at yourself as you post another unsupportable rant.
Everyone else here knows exactly where the graphs come from.
Sorry you missed out.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/enso_advisory/ensodisc.pdf
Here’s a link to the latest La Niña advisory. You are a little late to think La Niña is going to cool the globe. It’s weak and ending next month!
Why would we think that La Niña will cool the globe? We are still warming out of the LIA. But thanks for sharing your ignorance of us, and science.
I see in Portland on OPB some kid is holing up a sign about global warming etc… I guess there’s a big protest or something? But do they know there isn’t any significant change since 1997, or are they just Socialists and want to control us?
My guess is, the kid is duped while most others know the truth?
I used to fall for this long-ago but and not truly convinced it’s fake either, just not as emotional over it as I used to be.