The Key Global Warming Scamsters

If Obama raped a nun live on MSNBC, his supporters would either say it didn’t happen, or say it was “justified and noble, and done to teach us about the evils of rape”

  • Glenn Greenwald 2012

Belief in catastrophic global warming requires that people don’t think for themself, listen only to corrupt sources of information, and refuse to listen to anyone who tells the truth. Here are the primary enablers of the scam.

#1 Scamster : John Cook

With his 97% consensus fraud, John Cook provided global warming cult followers the excuse they needed to turn their brain off, and replace any actual thought process with an appeal to authority. They simply aren’t qualified to question 97% of the world’s scientists, and must not allow their own thoughts, observations or actual data to interfere with the scam.

#2 Scamster : Naomi Oreskes

In her movie “Merchants of Doubt” – Naomi Oreskes provided the global warming cult the excuse to needed to plug their ears, by linking climate skeptics to big oil/tobacco via evidence-free innuendo.  Climate skeptics are evil and must not be be heard.

#3 Scamster : James Hansen

James Hansen made the global warming scam official in 1988, and repeated every four years or so that we only had four years left to save the planet. He also invented the art of climate data tampering.  His urgency gave the global warming scamsters the excuse they needed to shut down debate.

#4 Scamster : Barack Obama

Obama is very likely the person who commissioned the work of Cook and Oreskes, and he extended their fraud to include the word dangerous. So anyone who uses their brain or tells the truth about climate is a member of the flat earth society and must be ignored. Obama was the global warming scam’s head of marketing.

#5 Scamsters : New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, and most of the rest of the press.

The mainstream media uses the work of Cooke, Oreskes, and Hansen as their excuse to push global warming fake news, and censor any actual data or anyone who presents factual information about climate. The urgency and threat level is simply too high to allow other opinions to be heard.

#6 Scamsters : Mann, Hayhoe, and several other junk scientists who are willing to lie, cheat and tamper with data in support of the scam.

In summary, global warming  is real, man-made, a mortal threat, all scientists agree, only evil people disagree, and anyone who disagrees must be silenced.  It took many billions of dollars and decades of hard work and organization to achieve this Orwellian climate world we live in.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to The Key Global Warming Scamsters

  1. arn says:

    Well-The life rape has already happened and is happening already all the times
    in climate science,
    but no matter how many times they get caught lying
    (there never was an ice age scare,climate gate 1&2)
    or tampering data,
    or completely failed predictions
    (polar bears extinct,increased sea level rise,more hurricanes,
    drowned manhattan)
    permanently moving goal posts.
    Even lies that happened right now(current hurricane)

    They will simply pretend it away and call people every name in the book
    who stopped believing these pathological.

    No matter how many times you lie or how wrong,fake&corrupt you are-
    as long as you are a slimey buttkisser and hide behind ‘good intentions’
    and big words
    you are right.

  2. RAH says:

    The supporting cast of worker bees for the scamsters listed would fill volumes I imagine and would include fair numbers in NOAA, NASA and various other Federal and State agencies.

    • AndyDC says:

      I know people who work for both agencies that are very much with us, but they are either retired or tow the party line at work to keep their jobs.

  3. Johansen says:

    Well…. they have succeeded in scaring millions of people half to death, to the point of splitting families and fracturing society just about everywhere you go

  4. Gator says:

    ”Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”
    -François-Marie Arouet

    • Louis Hooffstetter says:

      ”Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

      Wait a minute! That’s a quote by Voltaire.
      And for those of us less educated than Gator, François-Marie Arouet was also known as Voltaire. (I’m one of them. I had to look it up).

  5. Frank K. says:

    It’s my belief that scientists like Hansen, Mann etc., and all of their associates and friends in academia, government, and the media, essentially make up what I call the “climate deep state.” Anything that goes against their orthodoxy is actively opposed and “resisted” to the point of damaging the lives and reputations of people and institutions who go against the party line.

    If anyone has seen the latest Project Veritas videos showing several federal workers (apparently affiliated with radical left wing socialist/communist groups) actively trying to subvert our government, I think you’ll agree that the “deep state” is alive and well in the U.S. How ironic that the DOJ is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election while at the same time being infiltrated by these deep state left wing radicals…

    • Johansen says:

      Agreed. Right now half of the U.S. Congress is engaged in espionage, receiving kickbacks, steering Federal contracts to their families, trafficking in secret documents, and trading on inside information. The Clinton racket family is *still* selling and making available documents to the Russians and receiving compensation. These people don’t stop just because of a phony investigation! This is why most/many people go to Congress! This is the air they breath. They’re not going to stop!… good grief. All the Russians (and Chinese) need to do is wave money in the air in the form of speaking fees… haha what a joke… Contracts to friends… Shares of stock in a Panamanian bank account…. Insider information… and on and on
      And they’re not going to ‘investigate themselves’. That’s another fallacy. Half of them have FBI files. That’s how Washington protects their own. They get these guys at a party and pretty soon they’re photographed with underage hookers and drugs. Tow the line after that or you’re spending 30 years in prison. That’s how a “swamp” operates
      Photographs tell a lot. Sen. Schumer has the look of somebody who just shook hands on a deal. Putin is looking at his donut and coffee, thinking, “what did you just put in here?”

      Okay, I need to go back to work here. This is irritating me too much

  6. GW Smith says:

    Nuremberg, 2018!

    Thanks, Tony.

  7. Josh says:

    And when their nonsense predictions go wrong, you are a denier to claim they were wrong!
    Disgusting to see these frauds making nonsense everyday and people believing them without realizing data does not support their predictions. Time to drain the swamp!

  8. Robert says:

    How can any reasonable person dispute great climate scientist like Robert Redford, Al Gore, Leonardo DiCaprio and Barrack Obama; I mean, REALLY?

  9. garyh845 says:

    “James Hansen made the global warming scam official in 1988.”

    And they followed: “We have to offer up scary scenarios… each of us has to decide the right balance between being effective and being honest.” – Stephen Schneider, lead IPCC author, 1989

  10. Louis Hooffstetter says:

    Michael Crichton’s book State of Fear was instrumental in opening my eyes to the Global Warming scam. It was very well written and researched, and included empirical data and references (very much like Tony’s work here). I recommend it to anyone who is not sure whether Climate Change is a real problem or not.

    And like Tony the scamsters at the “Union of Concerned Scientists” are ‘Fact Checking’ his work in an effort to debunk him:

    The “Union of Concerned Scientists” are as much real scientists as Elizabeth Warren is a real Cherokee.

  11. AndyDC says:

    You don’t need to tamper with the hard data to prove your point. They do. You don’t need to eliminate stations to prove your point. They do. You don’t need to do siting tricks to bias your data. They do. You don’t need to start your charts in 1979 (the coldest year since the Little Ice Age) to prove your point. They do.

  12. frederik wisse says:

    Generally the top-monkey on the rock is the one choosing his women he is mating with
    and the men who are allowed to follow him . Your previous president was well aware of this fact and thought that he could control the future as well using the tools the secret services gave him . Except that this was in his position eating from the forbidden tree without the proven interference of a snake-like entity . Your president today is a person who choose his women and his male followers already before he managed the top of the rock. For the moment he is stuck with the remnats of the previous cabal that are extremely hostile towards him , which is in essence very primitive . How is this resolved in the monkey-world ? Think about it , we humans have very little choice , when the kettle is coming home to roost . Unlike Obama the rest mentioned in this article are patsies that will be blown away at the first signs of a storm .

  13. Taphonomic says:

    You missed the original 97% paper.

    A master’s thesis by Zimmerman who had Doran as her adviser. Doran later published about this in EOS (which is not a peer reviewed journal). This wondrous piece of work where a survey of 10,256 with 3146 respondents was whittled down to 75 out of 77 “expert” ‘active climate researchers’ to give the 97% figure. And the questions were so vague that most people would answer yes.

  14. David Smith says:

    How come Al Gore never received a jumper (a place in the team).

    • Louis Hooffstetter says:

      Al Gore should be considered to be the team’s coach. Because he controlled the money, he determined who would get to play, and who would be benched. Honest climate scientists like Dr. Bill Gray got benched, while 4th string wannabes like Mikey Mann, Gavin Schmidt, and Kevin Trenberth were put in as starters.

      All of science has suffered from the past three decades plus of climate fraud.

  15. Steven Fraser says:

    … and, the methodology was modified as a result of the preliminary results….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.