It must be global warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
Don’t you know the thermometer lives in a global warming bubble unaffected by reality just like the alarmists. /sarc I’m not sure why they haven’t started lighting fires underneath these thermometers. They’ve stopped trying to have any kind of credibility long ago.
http://canberrafires.xsnet.org
Bushfires definitely warm Canberra up, 90% of which are deliberately or accidentally lit by people.
Canberra temp record is crap unless the site is relocated
Who says they haven’t been?
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/an_inconvenient_lighter.jpg?w=640
🙂
The surface stations project found a fair number of stations with burn barrels located right next to the stevenson screens.
It was there or in the frosty dell down the road.
/sarcoff
Sarcoff…isn’t that some Russian?
niet!
Second cousin to the last great Ukranian castrato Ivan Nockabollokoff, actually.
Yakov Smirnoff not Sarcoff
Sarkozy is from Hungary originally. (Former President of France)
Sarcon is the first author of the IPCC AR5 report and Sarcoff is the last one.
They do a lot of work together, those two eminent climate scientists.
They probably cooled the record before the parking lot was there and warmed it after it was there.
Not any more. It has been moved closer to runway 30.
There are about half as many measurement points than in the 80’s. Interestingly, about 85% of the thermometers that the climate alarmists removed were at high (cooler), rather then lower (warmer) altitudes. That allows them to “interpolate” between two or three lower (warmer) measurement points.
Tip of the iceberg … so to speak.
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/10/australian-summer-maximums-warmed-by-200/
I see that, like Tony/Steve here, Ken Stewart has been hard at work analyzing all the official fakery.
Good on him and a big thanks to both Ken and Tony.
… and Jennifer Marohasy in Oz as well. Doing great work digging the truth back out from under the “adjustments.”
Sorry, and Jennifer, and all who have taken time and effort to reveal the truth and reality in what is called climate science.
As usual this post started small and grew but I thought it might be nice to list at least some of the skeptics around the world who are working on the ‘Temperature Adjustment Problem’
When you put all the work together it is obvious that CAGW is a monstrous scam. With any other fraud, involving billions in rip-offs, people would be out for blood. Unfortunately when it is collusion between parasitic scientists and predatory politicians it is tough to even get the word out much less bring the criminals to book:
Anyway do not forget all the hard work by : Frank Lansner and Nicolai Skjoldby over in Europe.
http://hidethedecline.eu/pages/posts/part1-the-perplexing-temperature-data-published-1974-84-and-recent-temperature-data-181.php
And E.M. Smith: AGW is a thermometer count artifact
GHCN – GIStemp Interactions – The Bolivia Effect “GIStemp anomaly maps show warmth where there is no data. “
chiefio(DOT)wordpress.com/2010/01/08/ghcn-gistemp-interactions-the-bolivia-effect/
And KevinUK (Ex-nuclear physicist now self employed software developer) @ Verity Jones site Digging in the Clay.
The ‘Station drop out’ problem:
diggingintheclay(DOT)wordpress.com/2010/01/21/the-station-drop-out-problem/
Kevin’s Climate Website: is (wwwDOT)climateapplications.com
And then there was the Russians pointing out the fraud with regards to their temperature record. So that shows world wide data tampering. I am sure I missed several people but just this bunch shows the deliberate, intentional efforts world wide to defraud the public of trillions of dollars.
Great list of honest souls.b
Um, not to diminish those who’ve been mentioned, but … what about Paul Homewood? He is who I originally learned about it from.
RTF
Also, I feel there should be some honorable mention for the lukewarmer Fred Singer, even though he has attacked folks who question the AGW orthodoxy. I remember that for a number of years, he was questioning adjustments before it was popular to do so. And he is one of the only people out there (I am one, but there aren’t many) who have been willing to state publicly that the recent valleys in the GMT may actually be lower than the lowest point of the 1970s. And no, he wasn’t kidding; he wrote an article about it, and got it published.
RTF
Richard, the list was fast off the top of my head before my first cup of tea.
I am sure we could compile quite a list. Heartland/ has done so in the NICCP report.
Oh and if you want to have some fun guys go visit this site:
http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2013/09/09/heartland-institute-nipcc-fail-the-credibility-test/
The ‘scientific evidence’ presented is that Heartland takes money from BIG OIL! GASP!! And therefore there is no evidence in the NICCP report.
Your list was great, but I think Paul is one of the greatest heroes of this whole effort. Frankly, I don’t spend nearly enough time at his blog.
RTF
Of course the thermometer is next to the parking lot, how else do you expect drive-by climatologist’s to actually read it?? I mean you don’t expect them to get actually out of a comfy air conditioned vehicle and walk??? It hot out there, and no shade within hundreds of meters.
After all their computer models tell them the world is near the melting point, and you wouldn’t want them to get a severe sun burn……
Better still,put the station inside their office,next to the heat pump. That way they can take lots of readings and unjust upwards to counteract for the parking lot. Simple.
you have to admire our BOM for making sure our thermometers are so well sited – start of the art! Right next to Canberra’s biggest parking lot. A joke surely.
I have just been informed that this site was recently closed, probably to do with the newly built carpark.
This link lists it as closed http://www.bom.gov.au/clim_data/cdio/metadata/pdf/siteinfo/IDCJMD0040.070014.SiteInfo.pdf
It has been moved to co-ordinates Lat: -35.31 Lon: 149.20
This is a perfect illustration of why one should estimate temperatures and not use a real thermometer. No one can rudely photograph the “estimate” and complain it’s next to an urban heat reservoir. Bet they don’t make that mistake again.