Before Mikey erased the MWP and LIA, there was “no question” they existed.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
Recent Comments
- Dave Burton on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- Tel on “most secure in American history”
- gordon vigurs on What Me Worry?
- arn on The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- arn on What Me Worry?
- Bob G on The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Bob G on April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- Greg in NZ on More Proof Of Global Warming
- Greg in NZ on Heatwaves Of 1980
- Greg in NZ on What Me Worry?
We need to get Winston some more help. He’s gotten behind in fixing all those historic newspaper stories and it appears that the truth is outrunning him and his spiritual kin.
Each lie requires 2.5 more to sustain it, as a chain of nuclear fission events must release 2.5 neutrons to sustain the chain of fission reactions until the whole nuclear bomb explodes.
Such will the fate of the government lies that began in 1945 to save the world from nuclear annihilation:
Reblogged this on Climatism.
Getting rid of the MWP was crucial to the alarmist plan because with its presence all of whatever warming we have had would be called into question.
Therefore in the third IPCC report the hockey stick was the gift of the century to the alarmists.
—and the gatekeepers protected it with every brutal method at their disposal.
Their reply was that it was only local and not world wide ( I sound like a parrot) It has since been shown that it was world wide, along with the LIA. The settled science is that co2 doesn’t explain either event, nor do the IPCC models, nor does the IPCC attempt to explain them. In fact, according to the IPCC, temps and co2 levels were both fairly constant during those time periods (consult the hockey stick chart) . Without being able to explain the recent past it is really hard for the IPCC to say with any certainty, in the scientific realm, that co2 is a planetary driver of temperatures. Politically, we’re off to see the Wizard. Hi ho hi ho it’s off to get a grant we go.
As temps continue to level off or even decline, data tampering becomes harder, ( How far down can they take the temps down in the past) and cherry picking dates becomes problematic. With the rise in Arctic ice, cherry picking a downward trend in ice levels has become the norm instead of owning up to the prediction the Arctic to be ice free in 2013. Or even mostly ice free. Ice is growing which from their point of view has to be unexpected. I wonder if the current expedition to do fly overs is looking for the polar hot spot not showing up on satellite data. I can tell you what their report will say. ” We found the conditions in the Arctic consistent with global warming. More warming means more ice.”