The animation compares current drought vs. 60 years ago and 80 years ago.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Bob G on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Greg in NZ on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- conrad ziefle on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Margaret Smith on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Bruce of Newcastle on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- arn on Obliterating Bill Gates
- oeman50 on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- arn on The End Of Everything
It is interesting that in California, there is only moderate drought and extreme drought, nothing in between. Another thing, most of the US drought is in areas that are very dry to begin with.
You never hear any good news from the LSM or alamist “scientists”, only the bad. This might be the most benign stretch of US weather in history.
Meanwhile, -67 F in Siberia, massive snows in Japan. If it is -63 instead, we would all die!
Obviously Nevada is misnamed.
Yes, the ‘experts’ claim if it is -62 rather than -68, we have severe warming! It is insane. The only place to see if there is ‘global warming’ is the equator. If it gets progressively hotter…and NOT because of cutting down the rain forests!…then we might have ‘global warming’. You don’t go to the extreme cold poles to see this.
The poles vary a lot over the eons. While the equator doesn’t. Again: the cutting of rain forests does impact the equatorial belt’s climate. Which is very much man-made. Of course, denying the people there access to fossil fuels means more forest cutting!