NCDC Climate Extremes Index Is Inverted From Reality

5 Responses to NCDC Climate Extremes Index Is Inverted From Reality

1. Gail Combs says:

   December 19, 2014 at 4:26 pm

   Boy they really lie. I hope the Republican Congress does an investigation into all these lies but I am not really hopeful anything will be done.

   Reply
   • Bob Weber says:

     December 19, 2014 at 4:47 pm

     I hear you Gail. I’m not holding my breath waiting for one side of the dialectic to police the other side – it rarely happens. What I do think is possible is to re-focus both sides to the truth that the Sun drives the weather and climate, using facts. Objective reality is going to beat the warmists’ “consensus reality”, in time.

     These climate extremes index graphs will be used to illustrate the overwhelming solar influence on climate extremes, as I do see the solar signature in the above graphics with no trouble whatsoever.

     A more active Sun means more actual power entering the system, that does do more work on the system, driving all things higher, and vice versa during low solar periods.

     Piece of cake.

     Reply
2. emsnews says:

   December 20, 2014 at 12:12 am

   As the planet cools, the lies proliferate.

   Reply
3. Gail Combs says:

   December 20, 2014 at 2:07 am

   Given the amount of lies we are fed, I think the World Leaders are well aware that the planet will cool and have been aware of it for several decades.

   The Milankovitch cycles were being confirmed in the late 1960s to early 1970s culminating in Hays, Imbrie, and Shackleton’s 1976 paper “Variations in the Earth’s Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages.” Along with this Gleissberg’s work on the 88-year solar cycle was available. Gleissberg [1944] and Gleissberg [1958] This would allow a prediction of 40 to 50 years of warming following the 1970s. Maurice Strong as chair of the 1972 UN First Earth Summit was already preaching “Global WARMING’ not global cooling (Elaine Dewar, Toronto’s Saturday Night magazine) indicating knowledge of this prediction.

   The newest paper on The Centennial Gleissberg Cycle and its Association with Extended Minima by Joan Feynman (sister of physicist Richard Feynman) and A. Ruzmaikin notes “The recent extended minimum of solar and geomagnetic variability (XSM) mirrors the XSMs in the 19th and 20th centuries: 1810–1830 and 1900–1910.”

   Looking at CET for 1810 to 1830 it looks like a major dip in temperature while the 1900 to 1910 look like a minor dip in temperature.
   http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/clip_image002_thumb8.jpg

   A close look at the bottom graph shows 1900 almost as cold as the 1970s
   http://www.sturmsoft.com/climate/suckling_mitchell_2000_fig2_3.gif

   When you also consider Obama’s Science Czar, John Holdren and his buddies Paul and Anne Ehrlich wrote in their book Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions (W.H. Freeman and Company, 1973), on page 235

   “The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being,”

   illustrating the contempt in which the Elite hold the ‘Great Unwashed’ (It is mind boggling that Holden, with those types of extreme views would even be considered by the Congress of the USA for anything but the nearest loony bin)

   It then becomes plausible that the Elite really might hold views similar to Ted Turner.
   “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN Foundation

   After all if you consider humans as nothing but cattle then you have no problem in exterminating those who are not useful to you just as ranchers have no problem in culling a herd of real cattle when it gets too big. If the World Leaders think we are headed for cooling and food shortages as we saw in 1969 or worse, culling the human herd of useless eaters would make perfect sense to them.

   Fabian Co-founder George Bernard Shaw certainly would agree with Holdren and his buddies.

   “A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people’s time to look after them.” — George Bernard Shaw, Lecture to the Eugenics Education Society, Reported in The Daily Express, March 4, 1910.

   Certainly puts the killing of cheap energy, mass immigration in the USA, EU and Australia and the stirring up of racial hatred in a different light doesn’t it?

   Reply
4. ntesdorf says:

   December 20, 2014 at 3:19 am

   Steve, that is a very thorough refutation of the NCDC proposal that things are getting worse and worse in the climate extremes index area. The graphs clearly illustrate the misrepresentations that they are putting out to shore up their position of lies.

   Reply