Climate Central says that summer maximum temperatures in St. Paul, Minnesota are going to increase by 12 degrees over the next 84 years.
Blistering Future Summers for 1,001 U.S. Cities | Climate Central
This is a total fraud. There has been no change in St. Paul summer temperatures over the last 70 years (i.e. Bette Midler’s lifetime.)
They claim that Omaha will warm 11 degrees.
Omaha summers are cooling, and are more than 5F cooler than they were in the 1930s.
They claim that Harrisburg, Pennsylvania will warm 11 degrees.
In fact, they have cooled.
Bottom line is that Climate Central is committing fraud. There is no legitimate basis for their claims.
It’s snowing today here in Scotland – as it has done almost every or perhaps every year since the notorious: “children won’t know what snow is”. The only difference is that we are now paying a lot more to heat our house in the cold weather because of this evil scam.
You ever get out into the highlands? Apparently some snow patches there survived the summer.
I believe it was several hundred snow patches–a record. During the previous summer, it was reported that scientists there had discovered a possible new glaciation. My source, as I recall, was http://www.iceagenow.info.
I think I may have found the problem…
Summers in most of the U.S. are already warmer than they were in the 1970s. And climate models tell us that summers are going to keep getting hotter as greenhouse gas emissions continue.
According to this model, heavier-than-air human flight is impossible.
http://collectair.org/images/gulfhawkdime.jpg
All the climate
con-artists“scientists” have is claims. I was taught that science was much more than making wild claims; but then I was trained in normal-science times and not the modern post-normal times. (or is it post-science?)It is even worse than that. They make unsubstantiated claims, and on the rare occasion that a claim becomes true, they shout that the claim was a prediction. When the claim does not come to pass they say (if pressed), “That was not a prediction, no, not a prediction at all! That was a scenario, just one of many possible outcomes.”
Modern CAGW theory cannot be falsified no matter what happens.
True but it doesn’t matter. I tried that line of argument with CAGW believers among my friends and neighbors. They say deniers are anti-science so I thought I had a ringer in asking them how their beloved scientific hypothesis could be falsified.
It doesn’t work. They don’t know what falsification means. They think it’s some kind of reactionary trick I am trying on them and get very suspicious. I think they will redouble their efforts to counter dangerous individuals like me.
Some major climatic fraud uncovered by the master himself
http://climateaudit.org/2016/01/29/cherry-picking-by-darrigo/
You don’t understand!!! it is like with Schrödingers cat, it only happens if you are not watching!
Move over Anthropocene, you’ve been replaced…
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/adjustocene_scr.jpg
Even if they are right… would this be bad? Could you imagine if the northern States and Canada were as warm as Texas?! IMAGE THE CROPLAND! We could feed the entire world several times over if we reached a temperatures as warm as they predict! How would that be bad?
Exactly. Their reference to Omaha is Harlingen, TX. Farms around Harlingen produce two crops per year. Imagine if Nebraska farms could get their grain in by July and then produce a winter crop. Too bad it’s a pipe dream.
You negative cherry picked your Minneapolis chart! You started it right after the extreme heat of 1934 and 1936, which if included in the chart, would have made your case look significantly stronger. You must have done so out of pity for the poor alarmists that you have eviscerated and bitch slapped so mercilessly over all these years.
The charts include all of the available dates for each location.
I would assume so. I was just teasing.
Climate Central receives taxpayer funding. Wouldn’t lying under the circumstances be considered wire fraud? http://www.climatecentral.org/what-we-do/funding