Whatever lies it takes to keep funding alive.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
Why are they measuring December thru November. What’s wrong with Jan – Dec???
I guess they are afraid of the extreme lows from December 2010.
If memory serves, there was an email in the climategate mails where a couple of the cabal were laughing about releasing yearly data before everyone went off on holidays.
Meterological year starts with Winter which is considered as December January February!
Using Jan, Feb and the following Dec to represent a winter does not make sense. Using JFM to represent winter also does not make sense. It was based on a seasonal thing!
However they all need to pick a period as base reference and all use that for ALL claims. They also have to pick a reference period of years for Climate reference and all use the same period as different periods give different anamolies. Because none of the data are fixed attempting to adjust one to match the other is futile. Of course we have seen the futility of attempting to match one years reports to one from a few years later from the same source.
Which ever period provides what is needed to support the agenda is what will be stated!
we should see a lot more of this latest line of bull from all the puppets now that their strings have been pulled and they have been reprogrammed to believe warm causes cold and snow!
Here is a chart I made from ESRL/NOAA data to look at relative humidity in the atmosphere. I did this for numerous heights in the atmosphere to verify the warming = more water vapor claim.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/cgi-bin/data/timeseries/timeseries.pl?ntype=1&var=Relative+Humidity+%28up+to+300mb+only%29&level=300&lat1=-90&lat2=90&lon1=-180&lon2=180&iseas=1&mon1=0&mon2=11&iarea=1&typeout=2&Submit=Create+Timeseries
Their is a steady decline in Atmospheric RH since 1950 so where Trenberth is getting his 4% increase in the last 30 years is a mystery. Tucker then regurgitates the hottest year green shirt/GISS talking points before other data sets are out. RSS is official at .51C anomaly for 2010 as compared to .55C for 1998. Professional journalism is a lost art to Ms. Tucker with respect to the linked article.
the sad thing is people will simply accept the warmer=colder argument.