Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “falsely labeling”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
So nutters kill people big surprise!!!
Imagine what he could have done with with a machine gun.
In fact if being armed makes the public safer why not give every one an Abomb then no-one would ever let one off!
I’ve been hit by two cars this year. No bullets though, and I have a gun with me most of the time.
No doubt he could have walked in unnoticed carrying a machine gun.
The point is that a rational person limits his killing to those who deserve it versus the psychopath who is indiscriminate.
The trouble with socialist societies is that they too often refuse the allow their citizens the ability to choose – in all ways – and deny their ability and right to decide for themselves.
Thou shalt not kill.
I am against all killing regardless of the situation, I am pro-life but would never kill a Dr who carried out the abortion.
I would not put to death a nutter either.
The trouble is in the phrase “deserve it”, who am I to determine wether someone should live or die, once you say one person deserves it then you quickly find a reason why another case “deserves it” and you kill people not being deserving people or a deserving race (as they use resources or put co2 in the air). You end up being a nazi 🙁
I have friends who were terrible people when they were young and were very violent, however with help changed their view on life and behaviour and now are good and trustworthy people.
The only exception I have is war against a nation like nazi Germany as that was a country that decided that virtually the whole human race “deserved it” , but even then I would have not executed their leaders after the war.
The trouble is killing is a very slippery slope, I used to see footage from Vietnam as a kid and it numbed me to violence as I’ve got older I’ve realised how precious human life is.
Remember you may think someone “Deserves it” but someone else may think you “Deserve it”.
Back at you, “the wages of sin is death” Romans 6:23
Sorry, Byz, but that IS my decision to make. It is the job of our parents and society to teach us the difference between right and wrong. The sane person realizes that all decisions have consequences and is willing to face those consequences. Only the insane decouple their actions from consequences. If someone breaks into my house, he must face the likely consequence of death. I am also willing to accept the consequence of personal hell, but here in Montana, at least, I have no fear that the State will punish me for the right and need to defend myself and it’s consequences..
All this is speculation, since almost all homes in Montana have guns, home invasions are non-existent. Only those with a death wish would consider it.
@Byz
“The trouble is killing is a very slippery slope”
“I’ve realised how precious human life is.”
—————————————————–
only HUMAN life??
Animals are people too, I’ve had long meaningful conversations with squirrels – you are already on the slippery slope my friend 🙂
I kill what I eat (if its not dead already) and eat what I kill but always with respect for life – all life
Suzuki Swift – more lethal than the .220 Swift
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.220_Swift
was trying to do the numbers but my ballistic software cant handle the bullet weight
Suzuki Swift with a silencer – they wont know what hit them
“Back at you, “the wages of sin is death” Romans 6:23”
Lucky I studied theology 🙂
This is taken out of context as what it is saying is that before Jesus died on the Cross we were all doomed.
You did not include the rest of the sentence, so lets do that.
“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Whereas “Thou shalt not kill” is a complete sentence.
I’m not against eating meat (had a great piece of roast pork on Sunday) as humans have evolved as omnivores and without vitamin B12 supplement vegans would not be able to live long… mmm what was that about “deserve it”
😉
“mmm what was that about “deserve it””
Thou shalt not eat live animals – they deserve to be killed??
“Its not dead. Its just pining for the fjords”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6Lq771TVm4