Leif says there is no correlation between solar activity and temperature.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue
- Bullseye!
- It’s Getting Closer
- Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Greenland Ice Update
- Wyoming Gold
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
Recent Comments
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Terry Shipman on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Jack the Insider on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- arn on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
I agree there is no DIRECT correlation.But there has been enough evidence of phased changes going on.
I am sure that Leif could change his mind.
Spots are down, but flux is on a much diminished upward trend line so far.
Sure looks nasty to me, brrrrrr.
Graphs of solar cycle length vs temperature have something which looks awfully like correlation to me. See Fig 7.