Grok and ChatGPT defending the climate religion.
“overwhelming scientific consensus and empirical data”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Defending The Faith
- 90% Certainty – Four Meters Of Sea Level Rise By 2030
- NOAA Climate Fraud Index
- 98 Degrees Too Hot For Phoenix Residents
- Global Warming Threatens The Children
- Defective Memories
- The Last Refuge
- Consensus Science From 1974
- Kennedy’s Big Oil Infatuation
- “Truman Says CIA Was Diverted From Its Original Assignment”
- 1939 Warmth And Drought
- Never Mind About Sea Level …
- Another Climate Migration
- April 14, 1886 Tornado Outbreak
- Making Junk Science History Again
- Warming Up The Climate
- “What If CO2 Is Not the Real Problem?”
- Answers from the Borg
- Liz Cheney’s Warning To The GOP
- The Democrats’ Leading Experts
- The Siberian/Mediterranean UK Climate
- Escaping Carbon Dioxide
- Melting Greenland Update
- Disappearing Ice Causing More Ice
- Climate Misinformation From AI
Recent Comments
- dm on Global Warming Threatens The Children
- dm on 90% Certainty – Four Meters Of Sea Level Rise By 2030
- arn on Defending The Faith
- William on Defending The Faith
- Bob G on NOAA Climate Fraud Index
- Disillusioned on The Last Refuge
- arn on Global Warming Threatens The Children
- Gamecock on Global Warming Threatens The Children
- czechlist on Global Warming Threatens The Children
- arn on Global Warming Threatens The Children
“..CO2, a potent greenhouse gas..” It is of course nothing of the kind. A trace gas whose atmospheric concentration has increased by a negligible amount since the pre-industrial era due in part to a negligible contribution by all human activity combined, CO2 is a profoundly weak GHG if such can even be said to exist. ChatGPT, a glorified search engine, needn’t waste so many words, and no more “debate”, the conclusion of which is a forgone conclusion determined by power politics, is necessary. By inserting one simple element of truth into Chat’s blathering causes the entire Globalist/NWO/depopulation edifice to fall apart like a cheap suit
The question is: how potent can even the most potent whatever be when it is only 0.04% of the system?
Imagine walking through a small city of 10000 while randomly changing your direction every 5 seconds and allthe other people do the same.
How many weeks or month would it take to accidentally bump into the one guy called Zee O’Toole who is new in the city for the very first time.
Outside of nuclear fusion and fission there is most probably nothing that can have a massive level at microlevel.
And in those cases we have to deal with massive energy release
while co2 has non of it; just a bit of interaction with some weak electromagnetics.