Fifty years ago climate scientists wanted to melt the polar ice caps to save us from global cooling. Now they want to blot out the sun to save us from global warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- iggie on UK Officially Sucks
- conrad ziefle on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- John Francis on UK Officially Sucks
- David M Kitting on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Reid on UK Officially Sucks
- Billyjack on UK Officially Sucks
It is even admitted by the alarmists that the influence of clouds on the surface temperature remains a mystery, yet it appears the effect of man made clouds is known with absolute certainty. The likes of Tambora or Krakatoa pumped cubic miles into the atmosphere, and their effect was pretty miserable but lasted only a couple of years. There is no way even Bill Gate’s fortune would be sufficient to achieve and sustain that level of cover. This is the modern medicine man’s rain dance, nothing more. Since the Earth has always had massive volcanoes, it is reasonable to assume that natural processes exist to clear the skies. If the atmosphere did not exhibit homeostasis, it would not have lasted for billions of years.
I think Lovelock’s Daisy world model gives us a clue. The albedo increases for whatever reason, (more black daisies) the surface cools encouraging the growth of white daisies which absorb more sunlight, returning the status quo. The skies are dimmed by idiots, that cools the surface reducing the amount of water evaporating from the oceans, leading to temporary drought (which will be blamed on ‘climate change’), and reduction of natural cloud cover, until the albedo is restored to its former value. If this is indeed the dominant process (it is only a speculation) sustained attempts to reduce the albedo will be desertification, and persistent droughts. Speculation it may be, but it is more soundly based than the crap known as anthropogenic global warming.
Since Anthropogenic Global Boiling is melting the ice caps anyway we can now kill two birds, or rather entire species, with one stone. By spraying aerosolized aluminum compounds and human blood cells, along with 11 secret herbs and spices, into the upper atmosphere the Gates Foundation for Broad Spectrum Genocide can reduce insolation and cool The Planet. Aluminum compounds strongly correlate with the formation of amyloid plaques and subsequent dementia/Alzheimers so The People won’t even be aware that the world is simultaneously boiling and freezing. Most of them consume “content” through little screens anyway. All of this is true. I know because I’ve read the “Pal-reviewed” journal articles and monographs. The fact that they are all AI-generated is beside the point. AI is much smarter than us superfluous humans. Everybody knows that. For those who live in areas of high intensity aerosolization, Atlanta for instance, it may be wise to begin wearing masks again. If anyone asks they can say that “out of an abundance of caution” they are trying to reduce their chances of contracting Python Pox. “Scientists say” there has been an Outbreak since it Jumped Species from dingoes and alley cats. Most folks will accept this explanation on its face; they will simply nod in agreement
speaking of aluminum particles, there are a number of satellites burning up in the atmosphere every year (starlink?) which produce.. Some of those unknowns are starting to be pinned down. Last month, José Ferreira, an aerospace engineer at the University of Southern California, and his colleagues reported the results of a simulation of satellite aluminum burning up on re-entry. They estimate that a typical 250-kilogram satellite would generate 30 kilograms of aluminum oxide nanoparticles. Given the 2000 deorbits that occurred in 2022, that amounts to 17 tons—a 30% rise above the amount from natural sources. In an era of megaconstellations, that could lead to 360 tons entering the atmosphere per year. Is that why it’s colder in easten PA last couple years all seasons??
For cell phone convenience?? Somebody better wake up
Terrific video! and I really enjoyed the reference. This is also the basic idea of the novel Termination Shock (2021) by Neal Stephenson. In the story, a bazillionaire fires reusable shells high into the atmosphere, dispensing H2SO4 to try to dim sunlight:
“The elongated bowl, four thousand feet above sea level, in which this complex had been constructed, was referred to by T.R. as Pina2bo (“Pin a “two bo”). Anyone familiar with the literature on climate change and geoengineering would get the joke. Pinatubo was the name of a volcano in the Philippines that had exploded in 1991. It had blasted fifteen million tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere. The result had been a couple of years’ beautiful sunsets and reduced global temperatures. The two phenomena were directly related. The sulfur from the volcano had eventually spread out into a veil of tiny droplets of H2SO4. Light from the sun hit those little spheres and bounced. Some of it bounced directly back into space—which accounted for the planet-wide cooling, as energy that never entered the troposphere in the first place couldn’t contribute to the greenhouse effect…
“Pina2bo would have to operate full blast for many years to put as much SO2 into the stratosphere as its namesake had done in a few minutes. Since the stuff began to fall out of the atmosphere after a few years, the best that Pina2bo could ever achieve was just a fraction of the real Mount Pinatubo eruption. But enough to begin making a difference. And if the first one worked, more of them could be built…
“The positions of the eighteen shells were plotted and updated on a real-time map displayed on a big monitor. They were spread out like beads on a string along a trajectory that rose straight up from the Flying S Ranch and then spiraled down through Mexican airspace. They all seemed to be following the same basic flight plan, like cars in an aerial train.”
As the story progresses, it becomes clear that trying to engineer the atmosphere has innumerable unfortunate consequences, altering weather patterns over large areas, creating droughts in some countries and floods in others. Countries will fight over these things.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/epa-head-demands-answers-company-putting-sulfur-dioxide-air-address-global
virtuous pollution
Well, the Brits little experiment is working. Here in Northern California, we have regressed to February temperatures at the end of April. I’m so glad that they know what they are doing.
The one context where a catastrophe model, complete with tipping points, was vaguely relevant was in accounting for the snowball Earth. This is based on precisely the same junk science as the global warming nonsense. Essentially a given solar constant can result in two stable conditions, one with low albedo (the current situation) and one with high albedo (glaciation) and the transition between the two is sensitive to small changes in surface temperature. This absence of internal consistency would normally be considered a sign of insanity.
In other words, a reduction in temperature is more likely to lead to global catastrophe, than a rise. Sagan’s ‘runaway greenhouse effect’ is as credible as the nuclear winter he predicted from the oil well fires during the First Gulf War.
I think that the new science is based on the extreme possibility rather than the norm, mean, or median. The person who will get the Nobel Prize for this step forward in hysteric behavior is Sagan.
West Europe apparently had a lot of heat during summer 1601. Pages 424-425:
http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/Weather.pdf
The very cold winter of 1600-1601 was a discretely solar driven event. A series of the same type of heliocentric Jovian events occurred in 1426, 1601, 1784, and 1963. An earlier series included 830 and 1010 AD, the two times that the River Nile is known to have frozen over.
https://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar
typo… 1423 not 1426!
Interesting that those numbers are 180 years(+/-3) apart.