No wonder government keeps talking about the Arctic meltdown. Ice is more concentrated now than it was 15 years ago.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Robertvd on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924


Not a fair comparison because the snow and ice cover outside the Arctic and Greenland was not projected 1996.
That doesn’t take away the fact that we have massive snow and ice cover on the NH this season. Nothing to worry about.
Their region of coverage of ice hasn’t changed, which is what this article is about.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/NASA-Climate-Change/353034908075
NASA is pretty busy on Facebook LOL!
http://www.australianclimatemadness.com/2011/02/the-debunking-of-the-antarctic-warming-scare/
Big fight starting over the Antarctica hoax
What are you talking about? According to the Washington Post, the Arctic is already ice free!