Climate groupies are being reduced to the same mentality as moon landing conspirators, 9/11 conspirators, and dare I say “Holocaust deniers.” Denial of the written record of history is a really stupid thing.
Can they burn digital books?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Mann Says He Was Correct
- conrad ziefle on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Robert Denby on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael Abbott on “under the Intermediate Scenario”
How dare you point out that Hansen’s past prediction was incorrect, when 30+ later he is still making the exact same prediction and people are still listening.
That’s Ehrlich’s specialty, isn’t it?
lol Ehrlich……the guy that denies the reality of his fail predictions.
lol, yeh, that’s makes me sooooo mad Imma dress up like a cartoon character and rant incoherent diatribes at you!
“Can they burn digital books?”
They can and they will if we don’t stay diligent.
As I like to point out, the pinnacle of historical denialism on the part of the warmists is when they negate the existence of a global cooling consensus in the 1970’s despite the words used by uberwarmists Peterson, Connolley and Fleck:
By the early 1970s, when Mitchell updated his work (Mitchell 1972), THE NOTION OF A GLOBAL COOLING TREND WAS WIDELY ACCEPTED, albeit poorly understood
Ironically, P, C & F have been the very first ones to deny their own words…
Ironic is one word. Deceptive is another. Those guys don’t care if it cools or warms. They are simply misanthropists of the worse kind.
Living in a digital virtual world they can do anything they want to their version of reality and we have the option of making fun of them!
“Denial of the written record of history is a really stupid thing”
Agreed. Unfortunately, many people believe those that deny those records. That’s even more stupid.