Gore has wanted to get even with the US since his chads gut hung, but nature just won’t cooperate.
h/t to TinyCO2
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
I wonder if Gore will admit he was wrong about this?
I just don’t trust people who won’t admit mistakes.
Obsess much?
Earlier today you described this story as “TOTAL BS”
Steve,
there must be some other Tony/ I never said this story was BS.
As I recall I was considering the possibility that a travel reporter might not have all the pertinent information to make conclusions about anything related to climate change
I copied and pasted your exact capital letters
Steve,
that is very funny.
In my comment I was agreeing with Sunsettomy that what I wrote was B.S. Because of COURSE we should believe travel tourism reporters over any sort of science.
my you have a short memory.
Obviously the travel reporter was correct, and your religion was blasphemed.
I like how they adjust the prediction: “New studies indicate….several more decades”. Oops! Old crystal ball no good! New, better crystal ball, good!
Kilamanjaro’s ice cap was observed to be dwindling since the 1880s.
Kilimanjaro’s vanishing ice due to tree-felling
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.08.001
“the famed snowcap is stubbornly….”
Do models factor in “stubborness”?
We have said all along that the science is settled, sometimes we have to adjust our predictions forward several decades because they don’t happen. You deniers like to twist these necessary recomputations from model adjustments as ‘moving the goal posts.’ It is unfair to consider it as such, because our previously settled science of AGW meaning less snow has now been slightly updated to AGW means more snow, so thus we have all along said that the snow would not disappear from Kilimanjaro because AGW causes more snow, as well as that the snow will disappear from Kilimanjaro as AGW causes less snow. Either scenario is not inconsistant with AGW. Thank you.