Record high is the new record low
North America and Eurasia’s snow cover has shrunk, according to study of more than 40 years of weather satellite-based snow cover maps.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Mann Says He Was Correct
- conrad ziefle on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Robert Denby on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael Abbott on “under the Intermediate Scenario”
It would not fit the agenda to claim an increase or a natural variation. The “Proper” Method is to pick the data to conform to your desired goals while discarding any that conflict! It is “Settled” Science!
This just shows that Discovery didn’t get the memo…..
They are still working with the old memo that said snow cover would decrease.
To use a trite expression, at the very least, the are making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Of course, we know that can’t possibly be true. We know a warming arctic means more snow in the N.H. Overland told us so!
DAMN! Someone ship a few truckloads of Head and Shoulders into my area. There was a LOT of dandruff out there this weekend. It sure can’t be snow, since we hardly ever get snow after spring starts and getting less must mean it was not snow.
LOL, what are going to believe, the experts or your own lying eyes?
Forty years?????? I had no idea that climate started only forty years ago.
What kind of limbo were we all living in for those older that forty years.
The key to this drivel is the following:
“was revealed after researchers made overdue adjustments to decades of daily snow cover maps. After fine tuning the maps…found a 1990 decline in spring snow extent that we still see today.”
Sounds like a Hansen revision to the data, and a Mann hide the “increase” by manipulating the results to indicate global warming by making adjustments to data and maps.
The inhumanity of it all!
“The prevailing wisdom for the past 15 or 20 years is that snow cover extent is more important than snow depth,” said hydroclimatologist Gavin Gong of Columbia University.”>/i>
I guess we can call this “The Gong Snow”?
I thought warmer meant more snow? That is before it meant less snow. This whole thing is really snowballing into another snow job.
lol, >/i> I can gather what you mean. What are the odds of people named Gavin having the predisposition of failing to grasp reality?
Yikes! Get rid of my backwards italic stop code!
Does Discovery even do science anymore? The last time I looked at a TV schedule for Discovery I saw shows about choppers, guns, taxi cabs, auctions.
Don’t forget crab fishermen! Their entertainment is actually quite good.