Team Global Warming Officially Joins The Ranks Of Flat Earthers

7 Responses to Team Global Warming Officially Joins The Ranks Of Flat Earthers

1. Sundance says:

   March 31, 2011 at 1:14 pm

   U of C Hospital was found dumping Medicare patients by the State of Illinois while Michelle Obama was a hospital executive. BHO a former pseudo law professor at U of C later provided earmark money when he became Senator Obama. Chances are these U of C guys are just crooked shills bought and paid for with stimulus money.

   Reply
2. Scarlet Pumpernickel says:

   March 31, 2011 at 1:33 pm

   ummm whats this got to do with space?

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5z5erU7fm0&NR=1

   Reply
   • Steve Case says:

     March 31, 2011 at 2:03 pm

     The conclusions are already written.

     Reply
3. Andy Weiss says:

   March 31, 2011 at 2:04 pm

   What is going to happen 90 years after a non-event? The same thing that happens after you calculate the number of angels on the head of a pin. Absolutely nothing!

   Reply
4. Rick K says:

   March 31, 2011 at 4:23 pm

   If “global warming is essentially forever,” then what happens next?

   The earth goes supernova and destroys the solar system. Probably in 2101.

   It’s the only logical conclusion.

   Reply
5. Baa Humbug says:

   March 31, 2011 at 5:07 pm

   Awww c’mon guys, the answer is simple, for over 4 billion years, after every global warming, we’ve had global cooling. Deny that you lemmings out there.

   Reply
6. cleanwater says:

   March 31, 2011 at 7:59 pm

   It is time to repeat the following information. Share it with others.
   Climate Realists Article
   http://climaterealists.com/5783
   ALAN SIDDONS   HEADLINE STORY   JOHN O’SULLIVAN   NASA  
   NASA in Shock New Controversy: Two Global Warming Reasons Why by John O’Sullivan, guest post at Climate Realists
   Thursday, May 27th 2010, 3:06 PM EDT
   Co2sceptic (Site Admin)
   NASA covered up for forty years proof that the greenhouse gas theory was bogus. But even worse, did the U.S. space agency fudge its numbers on Earth’s energy budget to cover up the facts?

   As per my article this week, forty years ago the space agency, NASA, proved there was no such thing as a greenhouse gas effect because the ‘blackbody’ numbers supporting the theory didn’t add up in a 3-dimensional universe:

   “During lunar day, the lunar regolith absorbs the radiation from the sun and transports it inward and is stored in a layer approximately 50cm thick….in contrast with a precipitous drop in temperature if it was a simple black body, the regolith then proceeds to transport the stored heat back onto the surface, thus warming it up significantly over the black body approximation…”

   Thus, the ‘blackbody approximations’ were proven to be as useful as a chocolate space helmet; the guesswork of using the Stefan-Boltzmann equations underpinning the man-made global warming theory was long ago debunked. If NASA had made known that Stefan-Boltzmann’s numbers were an irrelevant red-herring then the taxpayers of the world would have been spared the $50 billion wasted on global warming research; because it would have removed the only credible scientific basis to support the theory that human emissions of carbon dioxide changed Earth’s climate.

   But, until May 24, 2010 these facts remained swept under the carpet. For the Apollo missions NASA had successfully devised new calculations to safely put astronauts on the Moon-based on actual measured temperatures of the lunar surface. But no one appears to have told government climatologists who, to this day, insist their junk science is ‘settled’ based on their bogus ‘blackbody’ guesswork.
   NASA’s Confusion over Earth’s Energy Budget

   But it gets worse: compounding such disarray, NASA, now apparently acting more like a politicized mouthpiece for a socialist one world government, cannot even provide consistent numbers on Earth’s actual energy budget.

   Thanks to further discussion with scientist, Alan Siddons, a co-author of the paper, ‘A Greenhouse Effect on the Moon,’ it appears I inadvertently stumbled on a NASA graph that shows the U.S. space agency is unable to tally up the numbers on the supposed greenhouse gas “backradiation.” Why would this be?

   In its graphic representation of the energy budget of the Earth the agency has conspicuously contradicted itself in its depiction of back-radiation based on its various graphs on Earth’s radiation budget.

   As Siddons sagely advised me, “This opens the question as to WHICH budget NASA actually endorses, because the one you show is consistent with physics: 70 units of sunlight go in, 70 units of infrared go out, and there’s no back-flow of some ridiculous other magnitude. Interesting.”

   Climate Sceptic Scientists’ Growing Confidence

   Thanks to Siddons and his co-authors of ‘A Greenhouse Effect on the Moon,’ the world now has scientific evidence to show the greenhouse gas theory (GHG) was junk all along.

   As the truth now spreads, an increasing number of scientists refute the greenhouse gas theory, many have been prompted by the shocking revelations since the Climategate scandal. The public have also grown more aware of how a clique of government climatologists were deliberately ‘hiding the decline’ in the reliability of their proxy temperature data all along.

   But NASA’s lunar temperature readings prove that behind that smoke was real fire. Some experts now boldly go so far as to say the entire global warming theory contravenes the established laws of physics.

   How NASA responds to these astonishing revelations may well tell us how politicized the American space agency really is.

   ##############################################################

   Short bio: John O’Sullivan is a legal analyst and writer who for several years has litigated in government corruption and conspiracy cases in both the US and Britain. Visit his Website: http://www.suite101.com/profile.cfm/johnosullivan

   Reply