Not a peep out of Romm, Hansen or the Met Office. The press is printing endless garbage about Greenland melting down.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
Looking at that range, from -62 to -1 in Greenland, reminds me of how silly global average temperatures are.
It’s still cold in Greenland (April 2011)
http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/index/gronland/vejrarkiv-gl.htm
You mean I will not be getting a shipment of Pineapples from Greenland this year? Where has all the Warming Gone! 8)
More data for Hansen to throw in the can!
It’s old news by now that “global climate disruption,” as it’s more accurately known, is not characterized by a steady increase in warmth around the world, but by marked fluctuations in extremes. We’ve already covered this ground – “it snowed, so warming is a hoax!” is a very short-sighted response. It’s not about daily weather, it’s about long-term trends, and the data is clear on this – as are the conclusions of several independent bodies who have examined the science and agreed it is valid. It’s happening! Moving on to constructive action please!!
I see so, all the heat building up in the oceans and CO2 in the air is making Greenland cold.
Deb,
The data are not clear. We have “accurate” temperature records only back to about 1850 for most of the world, a couple of longer records from Great Britain back to the 1600’s. There are no perfect dependable proxies, and the tree-ring-proxies people freely admit divergence.
Have you worked with data professionally? If not, do you have any friends you trust who have? “Scientists” who claim the data are clear either get their grants that way, or are not scientists at all, but activists who went to grad school.
Just examine a simple concept known as “significant digits.” Weather thermometers are only accurate to +-0.5 degrees C, and in many many cases not even that. Debating a temperature rise on the order of 0.1 degrees C is senseless, we simply do not know accurately enough what the temperature used to be to say with any degree of precision or accuracy that it is rising now.
Before AGW became a media cause celebre, researchers all agreed on the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Climate Optimum, and several other recent warmings. Now “climate scientists” fall all over themselves to make these inconvenient truths disappear.
Check it yourself, do not rely on anyone else to examine the science for you.