WitchcraftClimate change was involved.There’s no way it wasn’t. The world we live in is a world warmed-up and altered by
witchesgreenhouse gases that wehave infiltratedput in ourcommunityatmosphere and that’s just the way it is. There is no control group. Every weather event we get is happening within the context ofwitchcrafta climate-changed world.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “falsely labeling”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
Tornadoes in a climate changed world are completely different from those in a non climate changed world. They don’t kill 700 people like those in 1925.
VLT (very large telescope) time lapse…..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFpeM3fxJoQ&feature=player_embedded#t=0s
That is beautiful.
Actually there is a control group. That control group is the below 300 – 350 ppm CO2 era, which didn’t lack for tornadoes or “extreme” weather.
If one closes ones eyes, puts ones fingers in ones ears and goes “lalalalalalalala”.. one cannot hear the tornadoes from the pre-350ppm era.
How many times must climate realists debunk these idiotic claims?
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/04/more-tornadoes-from-global-warming-thats-a-joke-right/
Justa Jow has a point. But if there is in fact no control group as the HuffPo claims, how are they controlling for variables? How do they know, in fact, that AGW is the change agent?
The fact that there is no exact control group means that one can’t be sure in applying heuristics derived from past climate. This means that assumptions of a dryer interior US are resting on a somewhat uncertain basis. It also means that seeing that it was hotter in the past doesn’t tell us with any assurance that we are in a state of normal atmospheric change.