97% of climate scientists have now graduated from kindergarten.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
First it was more manatees…..then more polar bears……then penguins
..now it’s the figgin ice!
Walking it back very slowly.
Don’t let ’em up.
Does this mean that we all hafta keep on livin? Shucks.
Steve, who is that nutball on your domain? More than just a few screws loose. Can’t you contact the service provider to regain access?
The last line is priceless. “if you raise the floor of a basketball court… there will be more dunks!”!?!?!?
Such intelligence! Purely amazing what they can come p with to show their knowledge of how things work.
They should just put Flubber on the players shoes.
So it’s going down from 100 metres (worst case) to 99 metres… ?? That would be an amazing concession from the Guardian… I suppose by admitting that maybe the worst case stuff was maybe kooky, they get to feel all sceptical for a moment or two.
Sea-level rises ‘may not be as high as worst-case scenarios have predicted’
There’s not going to be any detectable sea level rise. None et al. How many times do I have to say that?? Is there anyone listening to me?
97% of people quoting this figure are wrong -http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/97-of-people-quoting-this-figurre-are.html