“As respondents’ science literacy scores increased, their concern with climate change decreased,” the paper, which was funded by the National Science Foundation, notes.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Bullseye!
- It’s Getting Closer
- Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Greenland Ice Update
- Wyoming Gold
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Bullseye!
- D. Boss on Bullseye!
- Bob G on Bullseye!
- Bob G on Bullseye!
- Bob G on Bullseye!
- Bob G on It’s Getting Closer
- Bob G on It’s Getting Closer
- Bob G on Greenland Meltdown Scam
- conrad ziefle on Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Terry Shipman on Wyoming Gold
This is old news. The climate savant at Grist had it all figured out last year-
“For the most part, those who strongly support climate action do not do so because they’ve been rationally persuaded; in fact, they tend to be quite ignorant of the scientific details. People who reject climate science tend to know the most about it, because they’re motivated to learn about it in order to reject it.”
David Roberts, Grist, October 2011
George Orwell told us sheep(le) were not smart 70 years ago.