How To Tell A Scientist From A Crook

A scientist would look at the horrific weather of the 1930s, and try to figure out why it happened.

A crook would simply alter the data – to make the 1930s disappear.

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

http://news.google.com/newspapers

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

http://news.google.com/newspapers

The Tuscaloosa News – Google News Archive Search

12 Apr 1935 – DUST BLAST AGAIN SWEEPS MID-WEST U.S.A. Last Hop…

 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/2392462?

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/29178681?

 Below350.org

http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/064/mwr-064-07-c1.pdf

 Below350.org

http://news.google.com/newspapers

 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/

http://trove.nla.gov.au/

http://trove.nla.gov.au/

 Below350.org

http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

http://news.google.com/newspapers

 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/41498474?

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/

 Below350.org

http://news.google.com/newspapers

02 Aug 1934 – AMERICAN DROUGHT. Human Death Roll Reaches 1,350.

28 Jul 1934 – AMERICAN DROUGHT DESTRUCTION OF CATTLE HEAVY HUM…

1933

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

http://news.google.com/newspapers

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/16978063?

ScreenHunter 12 Nov. 28 14.25 Below350.orgScreenHunter 13 Nov. 28 14.25 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/36461163

http://news.google.com/newspapers

 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/35178367

 Below350.org

 Below350.org

http://trove.nla.gov.au/

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to How To Tell A Scientist From A Crook

  1. Eric Simpson says:

    The tooth fairy, an honest climate scientist and an old drunk were walking along when they suddenly spotted a hundred-dollar bill laying in the street.

    Who gets the bill?

    The old drunk of course, the other two are mythological creatures.

  2. They have too much invested now in this theory. If it turns out they grossly exaggerated, they are likely to be in no more trouble than if they ever get caught altering data. (Which is possible but perhaps a worthwhile low risk for them.)

    For decades doctors performed millions of completely unnecessary tonsillectomies. Their justification? Well, the procedures were within the approved guidelines of their professional associations. (Science based evidence was never required, just appeals to authority.)

    As far as I am aware, these practices were changed slowly but no doctors ever got “caught” or “punished” for “cheating”.

  3. Shooter says:

    I remember the days that if you caught committing scientific misconduct, you got your ass whooped.

    Not so much now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *