Huffington post declares : “Put that wall back up”
Should Accountability for Global Warming Be Linked to Crimes Against Humanity?
We define as having criminal intent any person who calculates that there is a definite possibility their actions will result in harm to others. Equally, we define as criminally negligent anyone who is aware that an individual is likely to harm others but who ignores the situation. In the not-too-distant future will politicians who intentionally ignore global climate change, or who obstruct action to implement conscientious policies to prevent deterioration of climate conditions, be deemed criminally negligent? The scale of death and destruction resulting from global warming may potentially exceed losses due to genocides and world wars. We need discussion of legal and moral accountability for gross negligence when it comes to destruction at this level.
James O’Dea: Should Accountability for Global Warming Be Linked to Crimes Against Humanity?
While they are at it, they should throw everyone in Washington in jail for ignoring the threat of running multi-trillion dollar deficits.
Totalitarian climate change thugs won’t be happy until democracy has been destroyed and the economy is in permament depression. Concentration camps for deniers is in their plans. Don’t underestimate the evil of these people.
This is evil akin to the Nazis. I cannot think of another similae, sorry.
I think it would be worse than that. It would turn into a witch hunt.
Every time there is a flood, drought, … a denier will be burned to make the god of CO2 happy.
“We define as having criminal intent any person who calculates that there is a definite possibility their actions will result in harm to others.”
Back atcha leftards! How many 3rd world innocents have died because of YOUR alarmism? Let’s start comparing body counts now…
I agree. Put the case to them that equally, alarmists should be accountable for causing billions to be spent and/or lives lost; see how quickly those morons shut up.
Blatant oppression of free thought/free will…the new ‘church’ is drawing up battle plans for it’s new crusade.
This must be destroyed, with extreme prejudice.
A comment on HuffPo…just…staggering:
‘Finally someone with a real sense of the criminality of what we are being subjected to.
Forget the past: give all industries 1 year in which to right the ship, cut emissions, install alternate fuel and power sources or else they go to jail. for a long long time.
Take a cue from China: execute those who willfully break the laws.
Threaten countries with nuclear annihilation if they refuse to clean it up.’
My comment was of course censored.
Never saw mine appear either….
“Forget the past: give all industries 1 year in which to right the ship, cut emissions, install alternate fuel and power sources or else they go to jail. for a long long time.”
Darkness, hunger, and war ensue.
Nice going peace loving greeniacs.
Yes, that comment is brainless. Germany is replacing the nuclear plants and is in trouble to achieve it within 10 years.
I got banned a Huffpo.
But I did develop a strategy that delayed that inevitability.
Write your post, and then erase the last sentence.
( the one where I usually comment on the vapidity or moral terpitude of the other posters)
Worked for me for about 200 posts.
beginsarc
HuffPo is right. We’ve already lost 50 million climate refugees due to CAGW. They must have died, because no one can find them.
endsarc
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/04/16/un-scrubs-50-million-global-warming-refugees-page-website/
See you all at the gulag! We all need re-education, that doctored data from Big Brother is the ultimate truth.
Would whoever took James O’Dea’s brain please give it back.
Well, the Huffington Post, keeps on huffin’ and puffin’ AGW. Well, at least USA Today allowed a Joe Bastardi to make an article today challenging their ideas. You can also vote on your opinion , and the interesting thing is that well over 50% of people that read the article strongly agree with him, so much for a consensus.
Remember its not a matter of agreeing with me, its a matter of the factual data and the ability to now objectively measure it. I am the one setting up the test of my forecast, not simply reconstructing the past where we could not measure this the way we do now. Its a simple matter of this: The last 15 years, the temp has leveled off co2 has not. Since the pdo flip it has started a jagged fall. If co2 is the driver why has the temperature behaved the way it has, and since the time of warming since the satellite era is linked directly to the pdo and amo, the pdo cooling and the amo cooling in 10 years should be able to show us if it the link, as I and many others believe. The real danger is the sun! If the ideas on that are right, then temps will fall beyond my forecast of back to 1978 in 2030. But the point is that I am advocating freedom to openly test ideas. My opponents want no such test, and obviously are avoiding accountability for such failed ideas as no sea ice in 2012 and the global temp under all IPCC scenarios. Yet my side are the ones accused of crimes, while we watch our economy handcuffed by an agenda that is regressive and stifles freedom? You are correct to ask the question. given the factual data of the global temp, how much misery have these people caused the world, not the other way around
Joe, I respect you immensely, and your work is critical, but these people are not interested in the truth, the climate, the environment, or humanity: This is strictly an evil quest for totalitarian power. No information will change their minds. But you can lead those who they might mislead….to the truth, so we can gain them as allies against this threat.
By the way, that was a great article Joe on USA Today, I really enjoyed it. I am a little surprised a mainstream newspaper like the USA Today would even allow an opposing view on AGW to be presented. I guess the debate isn’t over. (like it ever was to start with)
The way I read it, they want decent people to go out and round up warmists. I cannot condone that.
No need to round them up, just convince them Antarctica is the only safe place to hide from AGW, and provide safe passage. 😉
Hmm…
“a definite possibility their actions will result in harm to others. …”criminally negligent anyone….. who is aware that an individual is likely to harm others…”
“Definite possibility” and “likely.” Sounds like Minority Report to me.
I think that definition fits everyone in the country, let’s round up everyone. Please forgive another movie reference, but can you say, “Escape from the USA?”
You’re a Saint Joe! If you only seek the ‘Truth’, why wont you read ‘Tomorrow’s Weather’?
Don, you obviously don’t seek the truth, I’ve asked you many times to show me how ENSO doesn’t affect climate but you continue to resort to personal attacks and outrageous claims, and then call Joe and anyone who believes in the oceans having a large role in climate “ENSO elves”
David Suzuki advocated treating ‘Climate Deniers as ‘Murderers’ and prosecuting them as such, in an ABC Radio interview with Margaret Throsby last year.
But but, how can this be true? McIntyre, McKittrick and Mosher insist that AGW is merely a complicated academic dispute among egghead scientists without political overtones. In fact I believe the three M’s are probably more worried the so-called crazies on our side, while the fascists and communists of the socialist left are figments of our imaginations.
I really wish that the left would make a fascist move like this. It may be the only way to bring the real war, socialist neo-communism vs. freedom, to a head.
Huffo sounds desperate. Truth and logic getting in the way of policy?
I don’t need to seek the ‘Truth’ Eric, I have a forecast mechanism that works, as you would find if you read the work.