A closer look at one of the YouTube protesters outside the embassy shows that he was in violation of several parts of Feinstein’s Bill Of Rights Destruction Bill.
Note the high capacity magazine (probably 50 rounds) the pistol grip, and the folding (or even worse non-existent) gun stock.
Had Feinstein’s law been in place, terrorists would know that they are not allowed to have pistol grips, detachable magazines, or folding gun stocks. Terrorists may be cold blooded killers, but they simply have to obey gun laws put together by brain damaged US leftists.
The good news is that his AK is probably not that scary looking black color.
Everyone knows that if he had been given blue ribbons, A’s and a few extra hugs from his mother that he would loved have joined the peace corps, refused to bathe and sent in a ballot for BHO. Evil Republican capitalists prevented this because they are greedy and hate.
Feinstein would have started by senting them to sit in the corner, reconsidered, and then relented and let them have their high capacity clips. Why? because they are poor unfortunate examples of what the capitalist system creates.
Look to me like 2 30 round mags taped together.
Background checks! 😉
CBS is assisting Al-Qaeda in coordinating the next attack with the White House…
“Attkisson, who holds a third-degree black belt in taekwondo, takes a fighting stance when she feels she’s being stonewalled. Which is exactly what she thinks the White House has done to her on Benghazi,” Farhi writes. But from where Attkisson is sitting, there are actually two Goliaths, one of which is almost entirely absent from the Post profile. The second Goliath is CBS News, which has grown increasingly frustrated with Attkisson’s Benghazi campaign. CBS News executives see Attkisson wading dangerously close to advocacy on the issue, network sources have told POLITICO. Attkisson can’t get some of her stories on the air, and is thus left feeling marginalized and underutilized. That, in part, is why Attkisson is in talks to leave CBS ahead of contract, as POLITICO reported in April. Farhi mentions “internal conflicts” in the final paragraph, though he seems to dismiss them. The “internal conflicts” are indeed real — Attkisson is still eyeing an exit, according to sources — and provide important context for today’s piece. Today, CBS News is celebrating Attkisson’s commitment to the Benghazi story. It’s good press. But that support is an aberration.”
“Dangerously close to advocacy”? That’s how CBS News apparently views the work of a reporter who is doggedly seeking truth about an issue of enormous importance that many of her colleagues have scrupulously ignored. Remarkable.”
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/05/08/report-cbs-news-bosses-irked-by-correspondents-thorough-benghazi-reporting-n1591242
Stevens was purposely sacrificed by the Obamanation, and CBS (et al) is helping cover it all up. The only question is why Stevens was sacrificed. Running guns to terrorists?
This is Skeeter’s current deputy national security adviser, who has a degree in science fiction writing, and no I am not joking. He was hired at the age of 31 with ZERO QUALIFICATIONS (except that his brother is ‘David Rhodes’).
“Benjamin J. Rhodes (b. 1977) is the current deputy national security adviser for strategic communication for U.S. President Barack Obama, for whom he has been a foreign policy speechwriter since 2007. He is a graduate of the Collegiate School, Rice University, and New York University. He has been described as a realist by The Washington Post, and was mentioned by Time on the “40 Under 40” list of powerful and prominent young professionals in 2011.
His brother, David, is president of CBS News.
Rhodes wrote Pres. Barack Obama’s 2009 Cairo speech A New Beginning.[4]
Rhodes was the one who advised Pres. Barack Obama to withdraw support from Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak, becoming a key adviser during the Arab Spring.
Rhodes euphemistically described the United States’ military involvement in Libya as “kinetic military action.” In a March 16, 2013 feature story appearing in The New York Times, Rhodes declined to comment on his role in Obama administration policy decisions, saying, “My main job, which has always been my job, is to be the person who represents the president’s view on these issues.”
During the Benghazi Hearings in Washington, D.C. May 8, 2013, an article was published in an online magazine The Patriot Newswire suggesting that Ben Rhodes may be responsible for a Benghazi cover up. Is This Man The Mastermind Behind The Benghazi Cover Up? http://patriot-newswire.com/2013/05/is-this-man-the-mastermind-behind-the-benghazi-cover-up/”
THE INCEST MUST BE STOPPED!
Three questions from Krauthammer that have to be answered: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/05/08/krauthammer_on_benghazi_where_was_the_commander_in_chief_in_all_of_this.html