WASHINGTON — Years before he became the world’s most notorious leaker, Edward Snowden ranted online about how he hated people who spill secrets so much that he wanted to blast them in the private parts, it was revealed yesterday.
In 2009, the tech geek declared on a Web forum that groups such as WikiLeaks and The New York Times, which publish sensitive government information, “should be shot in the balls.”
Edward Snowden once wrote that traitors who spill state secrets ought to be shot – NYPOST.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Gordon Vigurs on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Bill on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Bill on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Bob G on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Disillusioned on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Terry Shipman on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- arn on “the science is absolutely certain”
- czechlist on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- arn on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
Skeeter calls himself unpatriotic…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kuTG19Cu_Q
I agree. He and many of his predecessors in the White House from both political parties share that honor.
That 68 year web of deceit (2013 – 1945 = 68 yrs) will give way to reality and mankind restored to sanity.
See info posted on Real Science – Do you think the rain might cool things down.
The latest Snowden’s revelation may or may not be real, or may not be him being sincere in what it was reported he said. It may well be just a bit more cover story – we have no way of judging.
It just seem too convenient for NSA/FBI/CIA to get a messages out that basically says –
1. If you’re in the USA and a terrorist, a dissident, or anyone deemed persona non grata, we (the US government) are spying on ‘everything’ about you and yours, and we’ll get you. We also hack better than anyone.
2. For those outside the USA and a terrorist, dissident, hackers, or anyone deemed persona non grata, we (the US government) are spying a lot on you and yours, and we’ll get you. We also hack better than anyone.
But because of the lack of independent corroborative information to check Edward Snowden revelations against, either, both, or neither statements may be false.
Credibility is being stretched.
I agree. There is strong motivation to discredit the witness, if you can’t kill or capture him.
What a sad, sad state of affairs for citizens of the once widely-admired USA.
With deep regrets,
Oliver K. Manuel
PhD Nuclear Chemistry
Postdoc Space Physics
Is Snowden a good guy, or a bad guy? Certainly the US Federal Government is telling us that he is a bad guy. Then again, those are the same people telling us that CAGW is the greatest threat to human life on our planet. They are the same people who tell us that they have found a place in the Constitution that gives them authority to control fire (or any other source of “carbon” aka CO2). Those are the same people telling us that they will just give amnesty to illegal aliens in the US and then they will make sure that the problem never happens again. They are the same people who say that States may NOT require voters to show their citizenship. They are the same people telling us that they can legally arrest and hold forever anyone they claim is a danger. Think of it this way; suppose Obama came on TV and told you that Joe Blow was a danger to America, that Joe was a wife beater and a drunk driver. Would you believe him? Or would you think that maybe — just maybe! — he was lying about Joe Blow just like he lied about everything else?