Russia is only a few miles from Alaska, but Polar Bears are 3,000 miles from Hawaii, 2,000 miles from Washington, 4,000 miles from Indonesia, and 2,500 miles from Cancun.
h/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “falsely labeling”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
Destroying our nation, one law at a time.
Destroying your nation? Really? Don’t you think that’s a bit far?
Not destroying the Nation so it doesn’t exist anymore, just destroying what the Founding Fathers instilled—because they are part of what he calls the people who made the problem and now have to get out of the way—so America can “fundamentally transform”.
I don’t. Alarmists and skeptics all usually agree that our dependence on foreign oil is harmful to the U.S., but when we find oil on our own land, thousands of road blocks go up.
More than that, the whole discussion is ludicrous. I’ve been to the pipeline, the polar bears give two sh*ts about the pipeline. It doesn’t adversely effect them in any manner.
So, lets review. More oil from the states = less dependence upon foreign oil. Also, more economic activity, more jobs, downward push on prices, etc., etc.
suyts
I’m with you on oil, though I think I’m farther than you on it—I want every bit of oil from Alaska we can get, regardless if it’s in land set aside by the government. I’ve seen pictures of where the oil is—there is NOTHING there. People talk about that area like it’s teeming with vegetation and wildlife.
And I want all the coal we can get, especially through mountain top removal because less miners get respiratory disease that way. People are concerned about the small areas that would be altered by mountain top removal, while never thinking about how cities have altered far more landscape than any mountain top removal ever has.
Do people ever wonder what the land where New York is used to look like 500 years ago?
I know Steven has said he hates cars. And I actually do too. But for different reasons. I think they are a huge expense and don’t give in return to what they cost.
This is the exact point when I joined the Sarah Palin fan club four years ago, when the NRDC tried to get the polar bear on the endangered species list during the Bush Admin.
I’ll be joining the Sean Parnell fan club too.
So Presidents have the right to do this because…………?
Next year he will be able to see Polar Bears from the White House as they will migrate ahead of the cold.
I don’t know how rational thought will ever win out in these times. The eco/green/warmest will never relent. One can hope the center segment of the population will come to a conclusion, but total mass right now favors the antidevelopment clan.
Where is a Thatcher or Reagan, in this hour of need. Palin is too young and the rest too timid.
Thatcher eh?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSrBO4_qPzo
You like her, huh clear.
Thatcher is the one who started it all in manmade global warming. Reagan appointed someone who was unqualified on the supreme court, Sandra Day O’Conner. Reagan gave amnesty to 5 million illegal aliens—which led to now 20 million illegals here. Reagan said there should always be a little debt in the budget, so encouraging all Americans to have debt—worked out great hey?
Oh ya, let’s bring them back as saviors. You think Sarak Palin would be worse than Barak Obama? I don’t think so.
I think I prefer Romney or Huckabee to Palin. I don’t want a leader whose level of intelligence is below that of an average high schooler
A bit of an exaggeration there clear? You guys on the radical left just love to hate her.
It he keeps it up, that person living in the White House is liable to be handed his walking papers sooner rather than later. (Hope springs eternal – exile in Hawaii can’t be all that bad.)
The reason I asked for a Thatcher or Reagan is because they were able to talk to the public in a no nonsense way. I have no doubt that they would NOT be warmest at this point in history.
Its going to take an extraordinary speaker to alter public opinion on the green agenda.
Someone who accepts the notion that greatness is possible, that Americans/English are able.