Real Climate Science

NOAA has no idea what historical temperatures are. In 1900, almost all of their global min/max temperature data was from the US.

Peterson-Vose-1997.pdf

Their only good data, the US temperature data, is then massively altered to cool the past.

But their fraud is even worse than it seems. Since the 1970s, they have been losing station data at a phenomenal rate.

Peterson-Vose-1997.pdf

NOAA have continued to lose data, and now have fewer stations than they did 100 years ago.

As was clear in Figure 1-1 above, the GHCN sample size was falling rapidly by the 1990s. Surprisingly, the decline in GHCN sampling has continued since then. Figure 1-3 shows the total numbers of GHCN weather station records by year. Notice that the drop not only continued after 1989 but became precipitous in 2005. The second and third panels show, respectively, the northern and southern hemispheres, confirming that the station loss has been global. The sample size has fallen by about 75% from its peak in the early 1970s, and is now smaller than at any time since 1919. As of the present the GHCN samples fewer temperature records than it did at the end of WWI.

surfacetempreview.pdf

This is why their data keeps changing. They are losing the rural stations which show less warming, causing the urban stations to be weighted more heavily.  Thus the 100% fraudulent blade of the hockey stick.

2016: Fig.A.gif          2001: Fig.A.ps

And then these slimeballs have the audacity to attack satellite temperatures, which cover nearly the entire earth.

The geniuses at National Geographic have finally figured out why Tuvalu isn’t going to disappear.

  “If you were faced with the threat of the disappearance of your nation, what would you do?”

That’s the question Enele Sopoaga, the prime minister of the tiny Pacific Island nation of Tuvalu, asked fellow world leaders at the United Nations climate summit in Lima, Peru, in December.
It’s a question that leaders of Pacific Island states have been asking for decades. As a warming climate drives sea levels upward, low-lying island nations face an uncertain future—or no future at all, say these leaders, who warn of their nations’ imminent disappearance.

Officials in Tuvalu, 600 miles (965 kilometers) north of Fiji, have been some of the most vocal critics of the world’s large greenhouse gas emitters—industrialized nations such as the United States and China—which they accuse of not doing enough to curb emissions, contributing to the melting of ice sheets and rising seas.

“I carry a huge burden and responsibility,” Sopoaga told the climate summit delegates in Peru. “It keeps me awake at night. Will we survive? Or will we disappear under the sea?”
These are desperate questions. But how real is the threat? Are island nations like Tuvalu, where most of the land is barely above sea level, destined to sink beneath the waves, like modern-day Atlantises?

Not necessarily, according to a growing body of evidence amassed by New Zealand coastal geomorphologist Paul Kench, of the University of Auckland’s School of Environment, and colleagues in Australia and Fiji, who have been studying how reef islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans respond to rising sea levels.

They found that reef islands change shape and move around in response to shifting sediments, and that many of them are growing in size, not shrinking, as sea level inches upward. The implication is that many islands—especially less developed ones with few permanent structures—may cope with rising seas well into the next century.

Will Pacific Island Nations Disappear as Seas Rise? Maybe Not

This is what Charles Darwin figured out in the 1830’s. Coral atolls are constantly taking a beating from the ocean, yet they stay just above sea level by pulling CO2 out of the water and turning it into rock.

Ocean World …: A Description of the Sea & Its Living Inhabitants 

This process is how very thick coral reefs like this one in West Texas formed. As the seas rise, the coral grows with it.

Climate experts are the ultimate anti-science buffoons, having to re-discover 200 year old science before they begin to understand how stupid they are.

NOAA claims that 2015 was the second hottest year on record in the US.

NOAA: U.S. posts second-hottest year on record – POLITICO

In fact, it was one of the least hot years on record in the US, ranking in the bottom ten of areal coverage of hot weather. During the 1930’s ninety percent of the US reached 95 degrees. Last year only 65% of the US made it to 95 degrees.

Last year also ranked near the bottom for frequency of hot days, which have also plummeted since the 1930’s.

This data is not in dispute and is not subject to any NOAA adjustments. Claims that 2015 was a hot year in the US are simply fraudulent.

Gavin thinks he can massively tamper with data, and no one will notice.

He has doubled global warming by simply altering his own data over the past 15 years.

2016: Fig.A.gif          2001: Fig.A.ps

He also ignores satellite data which shows that his temperature data is complete garbage, and that temperatures have not risen this century.

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

The fact that the US space agency is ignoring satellite data, is a pretty strong indication that the agency has collapsed into a hopelessly corrupt and decadent state.

Exactly 20 years ago, the East Coast was hit by a huge blizzard similar to what is forecast this weekend. Climate experts immediately blamed it on global warming.

21 Jan 1996, Page 10 – at Newspapers.com

Four years later, experts said that children just won’t know what snow is.

Monday 20 March 2000

the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.

“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said.

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past – Environment – The Independent

Five years later the IPCC said that global warming will reduce cold and heavy snowstorms.

IPCC Third Assessment Report

IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

In 2008, Robert Kennedy Jr. blamed the demise of snow on Sarah Palin.

Palin’s Big Oil infatuation
Los Angeles Times
September 24, 2008

By ROBERT F. KENNEDY Jr.

In Virginia, the weather also has changed dramatically. Recently arrived residents in the northern suburbs, accustomed to today’s anemic winters, might find it astonishing to learn that there were once ski runs on Ballantrae Hill in McLean, with a rope tow and local ski club. Snow is so scarce today that most Virginia children probably don’t own a sled. But neighbors came to our home at Hickory Hill nearly every winter weekend to ride saucers and Flexible Flyers.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Residents of McLean, Virginia will be astonished to be under two feet of snow Sunday morning.

After the 2010 blizzard, progressives became very angry that nature wasn’t cooperating with their scam.

22 Feb 2010, Page 17 – at Newspapers.com

Two Saturday’s ago I did my favorite bike ride up the Potomac to Harpers Ferry, West Virginia. They are expecting about two feet of snow this weekend.

The New York Times and Washington Post will of course blame it on global warming. If they had a repeat of the 1888 blizzard, they would say scientists are 99% certain of the human CO2 footprint.

We are truly dealing with the stupidest people who ever lived – also known as climate experts.

Wired thinks that a small wave along the Pacific Coast in January is an indication of sea level rise.

This Week’s King Tides Give a Glimpse of Sea Level Rise | WIRED

There has been little or no sea level rise in the San Francisco Bay since the start of records in the 1930’s. Sea level was higher there during the 1941 El Nino than the 2015 El Nino.

Data and Station Information for ALAMEDA (NAVAL AIR STATION)

We used to go to the coast just south of San Francisco during the winter to watch the 10-20 foot waves crashing into the rocks. It is an incredible sight. That pathetic little wave was the best the geniuses at Wired come come up with for their brainless propaganda?

It has been 10 years since the New York Times announced the end of winter in the Northeast US, and the arrival of Magnolia trees in central Maryland. They tied this to the demise of Polar Bears, disappearing Arctic sea ice and global warming.

With Warmer Weather, Different Decisions to Make – New York Times

Here is a big old Magnolia tree at Marilyn DiReggi’s Civil War era house in northern Maryland (which Montgomery County is still attempting to steal.) I’m pretty sure the tree didn’t just arrive there.

It is Arctic cold in Maryland and they are expecting more than two feet of snow this week.

There has been no change in winter temperatures in the Northeast over the past 120 years, with last January-March being the coldest on record. Winter temperatures peaked in the 1950s.

Polar Bear populations are up 10% to record highs since that story was written.

polar-bear-numbers-to-2015-sept-1-final1.jpg (766×365)

And there has been no change in Arctic sea ice area over the past decade.

iphone.anomaly.arctic.png (512×412)

The New York Times got every single one of their facts wrong, but that is the norm for progressives.

“It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.”

– Robert A. Heinlein

“Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”

– Martin Luther King, Jr.