The percentage of US HCN stations to reach 90 degrees was the smallest on record this year, with four of the five coolest years occurring above 350 PPM CO2. The most widespread heat occurred in 1931, when more than 98% of stations were over 90 degrees.
I’ll be at Union Jack’s pub in Columbia at noon, if you want to watch some football.
Newsbusters found this. The beach at Fort Lauderdale is identical to 55 years ago, when the movie “Where The Boys Are” was filmed.
1960
2014
People claiming sea level rise have no idea what they are talking about
Hansen points out in this video that the methane global warming scam is nothing but BS, because the concentration of CH4 is far to low to have any meaningful effect. Look for alarmists to ignore their prophet.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grYOoJfr3ao]
Yesterday on twitter I pointed out to Gavin that he calculates 1880 surface temperatures to 0.01 precision, despite not having any data for most of the land surface.
Gavin responded by claiming that his use of error bars means he is not calculating 0.01 precision.
I responded with the GISS data, and showed that he is reporting temperatures to 0.01 precision.
But here comes the real kicker. Gavin claims 0.1 error bars, but GISS has changed their own data by much more than that since 2001.
2001 version : wayback.archive.org/web/20010507……FigA.txt
The animation below alternates between the current graph with error bars, and the 2001 version. The points from the 1880’s are nearly 300% outside of Gavin’s top error bars.
They are adjusting the data by a much larger amount than their own error bars, which is scientific gibberish.
Everything about NASA temperature data reeks of propaganda. It doesn’t pass the most basic sniff tests as legitimate data. The error bars are meaningless green crayon.
Along the equator, sea surface height and lower troposphere temperature track each other very closely
At the blue circle we see almost perfect correlation between changes in lower troposphere temperature and changes in sea surface height (see graph below.) Note that neither shows any net change since 1992.
Here’s How San Francisco is Bracing for Sea Level Rise
Estimated to Impact $48 Billion in Assets
October 24, 2014San Francisco’s Capital Planning Committee (CPC) has adopted what is being called the most comprehensive guidelines in the nation for preparing for the impacts of sea level rise on a city’s infrastructure.
“This is the first time that I’ve seen a city really actively assessing the risks to new public investments,” Jessica Grannis of Georgetown’s Climate Center told VICE News.
The guidelines assume sea level rise of 11 inches, plus or minus 4 inches, by 2050 and as much as 66 inches by 2100.
With roughly seven million people living in the San Francisco Bay Area, the potential for displacement and damage to business and ecosystems is enormous. The Pacific Institute, a think-tank focusing on sustainable development, estimates $48 billion of assets could be impacted in San Francisco alone.
“Over the next 10 years we expect that we are going to be investing $25 billion in public infrastructure in San Francisco,” Brian Strong, Director of San Francisco’s Capital Planning Program, told VICE News.
While fishing for money, Gleick apparently forgot to tell them that neither tide gauges nor satellites show any sea level rise around San Francisco.
Tide gauge in the San Francisco Bay shows no sea level rise for 70 years.
CU satellite sea level data for San Francisco also shows no rise in sea level.
The city government is being defrauded out of tens of billions of dollars, to solve a problem which doesn’t exist.
Today marks nine years without a major hurricane (111+ MPH winds) strike in the US, and nine years without a hurricane strike in Florida. Both are records.
During the 19th century Florida averaged more than one hurricane per year, but that number has dropped in half.
It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong.
– Richard P. Feynman
NASA and NCDC are going to claim that 2014 was the hottest year ever, when in fact satellites show that every month of the year was cooler than 1998, with the 1998 anomalies double the 2014 anomalies.
Now look at the abomination which GISS and NCDC are publishing. It shows 2014 and 1998 tied.
So how do they create this fraud? They constantly cool the past and warm the present. All temperatures before 1967 have been cooled since their 2001 version, and all post-1967 years have been warmed. Based on the 1992 to 1998 inflation rate, it seems likely that 2014 is being inflated by several tenths of a degree relative to 1998, in the current version.
2001 version : wayback.archive.org/web/20010507……FigA.txt
GISS is currently diverging from RSS at almost 13 degrees per century
NASA has known for over 20 years that satellite temperatures are more accurate than surface temperatures, and that satellites should be used as the standard. They don’t do this, because satellites wreck their theory – and funding.
01 Apr 1990 – EARTHWEEK: A DIARY OF THE PLANET Global Warming
Why would NASA and NOAA believe their own satellites? That would make too much sense. Their surface temperature records are propaganda – not science.
