This guy shot dozens of people at Fort Hood, and Obama determined that it was a simple case of workplace violence.
These 400 heavily armed people in Libya were not 9/11 anniversary terrorists, they were just spontaneously angry about a movie they had seen several months earlier .
If Obama had a son, he would look this guy who blew his nuts off with a sophisticated underwear bomb. Obama told us that he was just some kid acting alone.
According to the report, the study’s leaders claim to have bona fide research that says the average size of a penis is roughly 10 percent smaller than it was 50 years ago.
Underwear bombing is a potential issue too for middle-easterners.
For nine days, the Obama administration made a case that virtually everyone understood was untrue: that the killing of our ambassador and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, was a random, spontaneous act of individuals upset about an online video—an unpredictable attack on a well-protected compound that had nothing do to with the eleventh anniversary of 9/11.
These claims were wrong. Every one of them. But the White House pushed them hard
Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, appeared on five Sunday talk shows on September 16. A “hateful video” triggered a “spontaneous protest .??.??. outside of our consulate in Benghazi” that “spun from there into something much, much more violent,” she said on Face the Nation. “We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.”
On This Week, Rice said the consulate was well secured. “The security personnel that the State Department thought were required were in place,” she said, adding: “We had substantial presence with our personnel and the consulate in Benghazi. Tragically two of the four Americans who were killed were there providing security. That was their function, and indeed there were many other colleagues who were doing the same with them.”
White House press secretary Jay Carney not only denied that the attacks had anything to do with the anniversary of 9/11 but scolded reporters who, citing the administration’s own pre-9/11 boasts about its security preparations for the anniversary, made the connection. “I think that you’re conveniently conflating two things,” Carney snapped, “which is the anniversary of 9/11 and the incidents that took place, which are under investigation.”
Wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong. Intelligence officials understood immediately that the attacks took place on 9/11 for a reason. The ambassador, in a country that faces a growing al Qaeda threat, had virtually no security. The two contractors killed in the attacks were not part of the ambassador’s security detail, and there were not, in fact, “many other colleagues” working security with them.
This isn’t just a problem. It’s a scandal.
If this were the first time top Obama officials had tried to sell a bogus narrative after an attack, perhaps they would deserve the benefit of the doubt. It’s not.
On December 28, 2009, three days after Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted to detonate explosives in his underwear aboard an airliner over Detroit, President Obama told the country that the incident was the work of “an isolated extremist.” It wasn’t.
This is right off his web site
If someone made a web site titled “White Americans Against Obama” – they would probably be targeted by the DOJ as committing a hate crime.
13 Oct 1868 – THE CLIMATE OF AUSTRALIA.
Apparently it is too much to expect that climate experts might actually know something about climate.
Climate scientists are speaking very confidently right now that the Arctic is doomed.
They know this because every other bold prediction they have made about snow, drought, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc …. has turned out to be a total farce.
They pulled exactly the same stunt in 2007.
“In hindsight, probably too much was read into 2007, and I would take some blame for that,” Serreze said. “There were so many of us that were astounded by what happened, and maybe we read too much into it.”
Tricky Sea Ice Predictions Call for Scientists to Open Their Data | Wired Science | Wired.com
Get used to it. The weather of the 21st century will be very much like the hot and dry weather of 2011. Giving extra credibility to this forecast is the fact that the weather extremes that we are presently experiencing were predicted in the first edition in 1995.
Dessler picked out one outlier, and declared it a trend. He could just as easily have picked out 2007, and declared Texas in a permanent flood.
January 4, 2008
This drought may never break
IT MAY be time to stop describing south-eastern Australia as gripped by drought and instead accept the extreme dry as permanent, one of the nation’s most senior weather experts warned yesterday.
“Perhaps we should call it our new climate,” said the Bureau of Meteorology’s head of climate analysis, David Jones.
Always remember the CO2 commandments – carved in ice.
The bonus commandment for NOAA – adjust the numbers as much as needed
It has long been known that the climate responds favorably to human sacrifice.
We may have our differences, but we can all agree that restoring the climate of the 1930s is a worthy goal. Let’s make the sacrifices which the experts demand.
http://news.google.com/newspapers
The Canberra Times 20 January 1931
http://news.google.com/newspapers
