Gavin featured this 2004 picture of Lake Powell on the cover of his climate book, in which he announced the permanent drought.
Gavin featured this 2004 picture of Lake Powell on the cover of his climate book, in which he announced the permanent drought.
Nobel Peace Prize winners tell us that the climate was stable below 350 ppm
06 Jul 1936 – FARMERS ON DOLE. One Bad Year After Another. WAS…

http://news.google.com/newspapers
http://news.google.com/newspapers

http://news.google.com/newspapers

http://news.google.com/newspapers

February, 1936 was an unprecedented 24 degrees below normal in Montana. July, 1936 was the hottest month on record in Montana, and June, 1937 brought a huge snowstorm which ended years of drought.
08 Jun 1937 – DROUGHT BROKEN. “MILLION DOLLAR STORM.” AMERICAN…
Weather Street:Clouds and Precipitation Forecast Movie
This will be the 200th thousand year event which has occurred so far this year.
Celebration aims to connect residents with global warming
Four current University of Wyoming professors and one retired UW professor have signed on to a local effort to promote limiting global warming through community action, and will begin to take action today with a celebration beginning at 5 p.m. at the UW Visual Arts Center.
Nobel prize winners Jason Shogren, professor of economics and finance, and Gabor Vali, a retired professor in atmospheric science joined together with three other atmospheric science professors at UW — Terry Deshler, Bart Geerts and Derek Montague — to sign a statement announcing the formation of 350.org in Laramie.
“The number 350 parts per million, is the CO2 concentration in 1987, the year the Montreal Protocol to protect the ozone layer was signed, and represents a target that, if achieved, would ensure climate stability for future generations,” the statement reads.
Celebration aims to connect residents with global warming | Laramie Boomerang | Laramie, Wyoming
There is a massive amount of empirical evidence which tells us that the climate was not stable below 350 ppm. Perhaps these geniuses would have preferred the 1930s?
According to IPCC models, if everyone in Wyoming traded in their pickup truck for a hybrid, it would slow global warming by about 0.00000001 degrees.
Are college professors in atmospheric sciences actually as stupid as they pretend to be?
29 Mar 1935 – CAUGHT IN DROUGHT CLUTCHES. Mountainous Columns …
Cera, please ask your mother to cut back on the pinto beans.
Scientists have a new scheme for controlling the Earth’s climate. Dinosaur flatulence trapped in amber for 200 million years is now believed to be the missing thermostat, and the key to regulating the greenhouse effect.
Thanks to NPR, the periodic table of the elements has a new gas classification
NIELSEN: A copy of that early draft was obtained by NPR. It contained no formal calls for limits on emissions of climate change gases, but it did conclude that problems linked to global warming were a threat to public health. It also contained what’s been described as a legal roadmap to the potentially useful greenhouse gas reduction programs.
These were formerly know as dinosaur fart gases, but now are known as climate change gases – which is more scientific.
Nessie on the Net! and Nessie’s Official Ultimate Loch Ness Live
St. Andrews University is located only 85 miles away from Loch Ness.
Did dinosaurs cause climate change? Huge creatures may have contributed to their own demise because they produced so much flatulence
By PAMELA OWENPUBLISHED: 10:01 EST, 6 May 2012 | UPDATED: 14:08 EST, 6 May 2012
Dinosaurs may be partly to blame for a change in climate because they created so much flatulence, according to leading scientists.
Professor Graeme Ruxton of St Andrews University, Scotland, said the giant animals spent 150 years emitting the potent global warming gas, methane.
Large plant-eating sauropods would have been the main culprits because of the huge amounts of greenery they consumed.
Dinosaurs ‘produced enough flatulence to force climate change’ | Mail Online
Note the time stamp of the Peter Ellis comment which was captured yesterday afternoon, and the time stamp of the fake comment which has replaced it today.
Yesterday
One Response to Real-Science.com For Sale
Today
One Response to Real-Science.com For Sale
Eh, in all the time I’ve been coming here, this website has been one of the buggiest pieces of shite I’ve ever come across. It is hands down the worst message board I’ve ever used, with random timeouts, unavailable servers and lag. The domain name might be worth a few quid, perhaps, though I suspect it’s as simple to wait for the registration to expire and then re-register.
What precisely are you offering for sale? What is the incentive for anyone to visit this site?
Essentially you are in the position of one who, having promised the world a nice sandwich, provided one with mouldy bread. Subsequently, you’ve jettisoned the filling (the only worthwhile part of the site), taken a dump in the middle of it, and are now attempting to sell it. Dream on.