Real Climate Science

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecover.uk.php

In other words, Arctic ice loss was about the same during the (nearly identical) early 20th century warming. Also, they concluded that changes in Arctic ice were not responsible for changes in climate.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/

http://books.google.com/

Continue reading →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Dec 1970

http://books.google.com/

http://books.google.com/

http://www.wunderground.com/

It is like Monty Python skit.

http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFLDE71402420110205

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/klaus.wolter/MEI/

Bad news for alarmists.

We keep seeing statements like this in the press – explaining the snow.

“It’s basic atmospheric physics,” said Meg Wilcox, a spokeswoman for Ceres, a national network of investors and environmental organizations. “Warmer air holds more moisture. This fact is apparent when you see water vapor hanging in the air after turning off a hot shower. When warm air holding moisture meets cooler air, the moisture condenses into tiny droplets that will fall as precipitation, rain or snow, depending upon atmospheric conditions.”

http://www.foxnews.com/

This is a nice theory, but the air is unusually cold, not unusually warm. Temperatures are far below normal. Are warmists actually as ignorant (and clueless) as they pretend to be? Extensive snow cover comes during cold winters, not warm ones. It doesn’t snow in Texas during warm winters.

http://www.guardian.co.uk