Sorry, I meant to say 2350
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
BHBHBHBHBHBHbhbhbhbhbhb. Very understandable mistake in voodoo science. Nice.
Obviously a typographical error!!!!!!! A minor transposition that does not affect the results of the statement.
So, you didn’t factor in inflation and taxes so now the $20.35 will cost $23.50? 😉
Skeptics Demand Live TV Debate in Global Warming Showdown
In response to calls for a media “rapid response” to sort out the climate change row once and for all, skeptic scientists respond with live TV challenge.
http://johnosullivan.livejournal.com/25387.html
Methinks Abraham + co will do a rapid Cameronesque retreat when they are faced with a real debate.
They will stick to soft formats with friendly interviewers, the sort of thing the BBC have made an artform of.
I believe the answer to Steve is that his mistake was vodoo science..? 🙂 Excellent correction, love it!!! I predicate it will get dark tonight (exclude south pole).
Actually, to keep the reference historically accurate – any critisism of Steve’s prediction would be voodoo science, as defined by IPCC head Pachauri:
“Rajendra Pachauri, the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has described the Indian government report that criticized the claim by IPCC over the faster than expected melting of Himalayan glaciers, as “voodoo science”.”
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/health/pachauri-calls-indian-govt-report-on-melting-himalayan-glaciers-as-voodoo-science_100301232.html