“Geo-engineering is an absolute fool’s game,” said Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center, in an interview Tuesday from his office in Boulder, Colo. “This idea that you are going to stop global warming in its tracks by protecting the Arctic is not realistic.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
Recent Comments
- Chuck on Truth Or Consequences
- Gerald Machnee on Fifty Years Ago Today
- conrad ziefle on Fifty Years Ago Today
- Bob G on Truth Or Consequences
- Weylan McAnally on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- Bob G on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Ivan G Wainwright on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- conrad ziefle on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Bob G on You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
One has to be real “special” and “intelligent” to come to the conclusion that to protect yourself from climate change is to try and try again to change the climate.
That is a good one to make statements about “Fool’s Games” or even some idea there is a reason to protect the Arctic!
How can you be wrong in so many directions at the same time? Geoengineering should work (eg see link, link), and would be relatively cost effective, but climate data clearly says warming (if any) is mostly natural, so why bother? Geoengineering is an elegant answer to a non problem, like designing shoes for cats.