CO2 was 310 ppm, well below Hansen’s safe level of 350 ppm. Death toll was 1,000 times higher than Pakistan this summer.
Apparently environmentalists care about people when politically convenient.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Engineering
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Engineering
- Ivan G Wainwright on Climate Engineering
- Russell Cook on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
Let me be the first to say: You are again “Cherry Picking”! No evidence of that, but as it will surely come up I wanted to get the claim out of the way. Where is the Peer Reviewed paper that supports your claim? (Of course that was a “Strawman”) but it gets that out of the conversation also.
I read about the 10 worst floods based on adjusted Dollars and Human deaths but there does not appear to be a trend other than a decline due to increased wealth that allows for better preparedness and better responses to extreme events that nature seems to deliver randomly.
The larger the flood plain the more chances of having a major flood just like the land changes contributed to most of the damages in Pakistan.
Keep up the good work.
These past disasters provide excellent examples and they make alarmists look stupid.
Don’t let the “cherry picker brigade” bug you.
In 1931 China was isolated and it was difficult to become any reliable news from that country let alone a solid verification of those news reports that made it to the West.
That’s one of the reasons why there is such a discrepancy between the minimum-maximum casualty numbers.
However there is a lot of photo and even film material from this disaster and the Chinese Government made several studies and analysis of the disaster and plans were made for the Three Gorges Project.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1931_China_floods