Nobel Laureate : Massive Taxes To Stimulate The Economy

10 Responses to Nobel Laureate : Massive Taxes To Stimulate The Economy

1. Andy Weiss says:

   January 18, 2011 at 8:04 am

   True believers Al Gore and James Cameron, should be willing to contribute their fortunes to save the planet, rather than further taxing our pittances.

   Reply
2. R. de Haan says:

   January 18, 2011 at 8:22 am

   The 80 US dollar per ton is a far cry from the -5 dollar cents carbon was valued at the Chicago Climate Exchange before it was closed.

   But African Leaders always listen to the West, especially Nobel laureate’s.

   That’s why all is so well with this continent.

   He might be successful

   Africa awful continent
   http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/2011/01/africa-awful-continent.html

   Reply
3. BioBob says:

   January 18, 2011 at 9:33 am

   I wouldn’t rely overmuch on Caruba. He often does not concern himself overmuch with factual accuracy or complexities of reality.

   African societies, like all others, succeed or fail primarily on the basis of their ability to supercede their tribal past and impartially implement the rule of law.

   Reply
   • Paul H says:

     January 18, 2011 at 12:06 pm

     Surely you can’t deny that most of the foreign aid has either been wasted or stolen?

     Reply
     • BioBob says:

       January 18, 2011 at 7:31 pm

       why would I ? its factual isn’t it ? Like i said, no rule of law, no joy.

       Reply
4. DEEBEE says:

   January 18, 2011 at 11:32 am

   There are no limits to the idiocy of an idea, towards which “intellectuals” will gravitate.

   Reply
5. PhilJourdan says:

   January 18, 2011 at 6:56 pm

   “Nobel Laureate” has lost its luster since they decided to get political about it. Those receiving the awards get them not for work, but for the committee to make a political statement. Thus any statement with a qualifier of “Nobel Laureate” is bascially useless, and the person should be judged on other accomplishments instead of the fact they are politically correct.

   Reply
   • suyts says:

     January 18, 2011 at 7:29 pm

     “Thus any statement with a qualifier of “Nobel Laureate” is bascially useless…”

     Not true! Today, I use it as a euphemism for either communist or terrorist or both.

     Reply
     • PhilJourdan says:

       January 18, 2011 at 9:05 pm

       Picky, Picky, Picky! 🙂

       Reply
6. Hal says:

   January 18, 2011 at 8:42 pm

   Webster’s needs an update;
   I didn’t realize that the definition of ‘Laureate’ is now IDIOT.

   Reply