
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!



Does anyone know what they are claiming for sea level rise in the past 50 years?
This book is written to help A level students ( 16-18 year olds for our colonial friends).
help?
Ice floating in water does not raise the water level when it melts. A body, in this case ice, floating in water displaces an amount of water equivalent to the weigh of the floating object. When it melts it fills the volume of water that it previously displaced with no increase in water level.
They are saying the Greenland and Artarctic sea ice will not melt for a century or two. So what is the big rush to find alternative energy?
The contibution of Alpine glacier melt to sea level rise must be trivial, assuming the glaciers are melting, which is questionable.
melting sea ice to cause sea level rise—-please stop the bleeding!