Romm Angry That The Other Side Is Finally Being Heard In Congress

9 Responses to Romm Angry That The Other Side Is Finally Being Heard In Congress

1. Latitude says:

   March 31, 2011 at 2:42 pm

   we won….

   Now how does it feel?

   Reply
2. suyts says:

   March 31, 2011 at 3:05 pm

   lol@ Romm…….whaaa!!!! whaaa!!!!

   Reply
3. Scott says:

   March 31, 2011 at 3:48 pm

   Another thing I’m tired of – claims that the e-mails were stolen and not leaked. There is NO evidence for this. And objective study of the facts, particularly the server setup at the CRU, strongly points to an inside job…aka a leak. Does this mean that the release of private e-mails is 100% okay?…of course not. But I think most people realize that difference between a “leak” with a whistleblower versus “stolen” by the enemy.

   What’s funny is that even if they were “stolen”, what was revealed in the e-mails was probably much worse than the theft itself considering many of the e-mails should have been FOIA-able anyway.

   -Scott

   Reply
   • Baa Humbug says:

     March 31, 2011 at 4:53 pm

     Those e-mails were about as private as you and the mrs having a shouting argument about your sex lives at a bus stop.

     Reply
   • Latitude says:

     March 31, 2011 at 5:26 pm

     but does it matter if they were stolen, leaked, or a gift from Muhammad….

     nope, not one bit

     Reply
     • suyts says:

       March 31, 2011 at 5:34 pm

       Nope just a bunch of hand-waving and screaming. Apparently some people are of the belief that collusion should only be done in private.

       Reply
4. Andy Weiss says:

   March 31, 2011 at 6:24 pm

   Whose the monkey at this monkey trial?

   Reply
5. Andy Weiss says:

   March 31, 2011 at 9:25 pm

   It’s nice to talk about winning, but these characters are never going to quit. If we were to get a very hot summer, the alarmists could make a comeback.

   We are way overdue for a heat/drought related crop failure in the Cornbelt and if that happens, the media hype will know no bounds.

   Reply
6. Dave N says:

   April 1, 2011 at 1:17 am

   Does Romm’s headline mean he is looking for balanced views at a climate inquiry? Surely that has happened every other time?

   Reply