CHARLESTON, W.Va. — There is a “pressing need for substantial action” by the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to avoid serious environmental, economic and humanitarian risks, a National Academy of Science report issued Thursday concludes.
Risks from dangerous climate change impacts are “growing with every ton of greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere,” said the report, prepared by a team of scientists, policy experts, environmental advocates and business leaders.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
There is indeed a pressing need in the face of a lack of rate of sea level rise acceleration, lack of warming, lack of tornado F3-F5s, lack of trend in extreme weather events and so on………………
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.021
Add to that:
We were surprised to find…….blah, blah, blah or something like that.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.776/full
Add to that:
We do indeed have a highly pressing need to solve a non-problem.
Pay up or else! Didn’t that line come for “The Godfather”? Or maybe it was some low budget gangster movie.
Steve, I don’t understand why you call this a “Ponzi Scheme.” “Ponzi Scheme” is a specific type of investment fraud (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme). While US Social Security might be catagorized as a Ponzi Scheme, AGW strikes me more as just a campaign lie to acrew political power.
I suspect most of the people involved are simply after research funding.