Lake Powell Up 60 Feet Since Gavin’s Model Declared It Dead

10 Responses to Lake Powell Up 60 Feet Since Gavin’s Model Declared It Dead

1. Kaboom says:

   June 25, 2011 at 3:30 pm

   Must sting to have one prime example of sea level rise and then predict it all wrong.

   Reply
2. Dave G says:

   June 25, 2011 at 5:04 pm

   I’m sure Gavin can tell you why

   Reply
   • Grumpy Grampy ;) says:

     June 25, 2011 at 5:25 pm

     It is consistent with the model scenarios. Some where laying around there is a model that showed just this happening. Of course some where laying around there is a model showing ant possible future scenario they could think of so every possible outcome is consistent with enhanced CO2 concentrations. This might even be a unique finger print for increased levels of human induced Green House Gasses.
     I have had the “Pleasure” of discussing model out puts with the GAV!!!!

     Reply
     • Grumpy Grampy ;) says:

       June 25, 2011 at 5:28 pm

       It may have been something I said but I have not been able to post a comment to the Gav for a few years!

       Reply
3. Jimbo says:

   June 25, 2011 at 6:54 pm

   One of the many model runs showed it can increase to these very levels. 😉

   Gavin knows the game is up.

   Reply
4. Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

   June 25, 2011 at 10:42 pm

   Speaking of Gavin the global warming advocate…..

   See interrupting and talking over the top of people in his advocacy:

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6S1unDve-M

   Reply
5. Mkjon says:

   June 26, 2011 at 6:50 pm

   Didn’t Al Gore predict hat the oceans, I mean all water levels, would be rising due to Global Warming?

   Reply
   • kuhnkat says:

     June 26, 2011 at 8:19 pm

     Nope, even the areas flooded by rising oceans of global warming will be in severe drought conditions!! Just ask Gav!!

     Reply
6. DMA says:

   June 26, 2011 at 10:19 pm

   I note that the increase in capacity is a factor of about 15.

   Reply
   • DMA says:

     June 26, 2011 at 10:21 pm

     OOps 5 not 15

     Reply