Shock News : Antarctic Sea Ice Has Been Above Normal 343 Days In A Row

In 22 days, Antarctic sea icea area will have been above normal for 365 days in a row.

According to logic invented by crack scientist Jeff Masters, the odds against this happening are astronomical at 2^343 power to one. Proof that we are all going to die in an ice age.

arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.south.anom.1979-2008

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Shock News : Antarctic Sea Ice Has Been Above Normal 343 Days In A Row

  1. Joe's World(progressive evolution) says:

    Steven,

    We have been programed to have an idea, create the product and observe the out come EXCLUSIVELY to the product and records it’s workings.
    It does not matter how it actually works or what outside contributers are in play.
    ‘Observed science’ and the ‘scientific method’ are strictly for what is being observed to the neglect of EVERYTHING else.

    And our scientific “LAWS” were generated around this premise.

  2. Eric Webb says:

    Jeff Masters is a complete fraudster, and makes every weather event seem like its the end of the world.

  3. mwhite says:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-20197535

    In pictures: November snowfall in west of England

  4. chris y says:

    Your result of 2^343 is way too low, because you assume that there is a 50/50 chance that ice will be above or below normal each day. But Hansen’s dead-certain predictions *prove* that you are a fool to believe this. We are playing with loaded coins, and there should be at least a 90% chance that every day has sea ice below normal.

  5. chris y says:

    With a Hansen-predicted 90% chance of below-normal sea ice every day, the probability of 343 consecutive days of above normal Antarctic sea ice works out to 10^343, or (10^100)^3.43, or

    a bit more than 1 chance in Googol^pi.

  6. Andy OZ says:

    I think we are gonna need seal skins or furs to survive the coming mini ice age. Too bad for the WWF.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *