Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Mac on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Francis Barnett on “Earlier Than Usual”
Death spiral in the making! (sarc)
Hey! That;s great news. Vineyards spreadin out far and wide.
When Asian soot finally melts all the multi-year ice, that curve will bottom out. The limit is probably 10,000 km^3.
I want it this year. The hysteria from the CAGW d!ck-heads would be the funniest thing, especially when NOTHING really catastrophic follows.
Like watching a particularly ugly balloon deflate.
Where’s the nobhead Ellis these days?
Maybe I’m the only one, who does not get it, but to me the trend shows there IS something going on with the Arctic ice. I mean, having the ice extent somewhere around median is nice, but according to the chart, ice is obviously getting thinner. Why is that?
PIOMAS is a model. They have corrected several times to avoid the embarrassing
earlier-than-expected-zero-model-volume-yet-real-cold-touchable-cubic-kilometers-of-ice scenario.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/06/28/piomas-arctic-sea-ice-volume-model-corrected-still-appears-suspect/
That explains it. I thought it was real (well, as real as you can get) data. Thanks a lot.