I don’t remember seeing any discussion of hunting in the Declaration of Independence.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- Gordon Vigurs on Cheering Crowds
- arn on Cheering Crowds
- arn on Cheering Crowds
- arn on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Mac on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
And at the time these men risked it all, by signing our declaration, one could bear exactly the same “military style weaponry” that standing armies carried. That was intentional. The only hunting they wanted to protect was the hunt for individual liberty.
NY is going to limit clips to 7 bullets. I had an idea to stop people from imbibing too much. Ban bottles of booze larger than a liter. Unless a person is stopped, how many clips can he go through? It’s all for show to try and shut-up the anti-gun nuts.
It works just as well as limiting the size of soda cups.
Bloomberg seems obsessed with limiting the size of other men’s appendages. He must have been laughed at once by TSA employees operating body scanners.