I don’t remember seeing any discussion of hunting in the Declaration of Independence.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
And at the time these men risked it all, by signing our declaration, one could bear exactly the same “military style weaponry” that standing armies carried. That was intentional. The only hunting they wanted to protect was the hunt for individual liberty.
NY is going to limit clips to 7 bullets. I had an idea to stop people from imbibing too much. Ban bottles of booze larger than a liter. Unless a person is stopped, how many clips can he go through? It’s all for show to try and shut-up the anti-gun nuts.
It works just as well as limiting the size of soda cups.
Bloomberg seems obsessed with limiting the size of other men’s appendages. He must have been laughed at once by TSA employees operating body scanners.