Solar Cycle 24 to be the second biggest ever!
Being a government expert means talking very confidently about things you know nothing about.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Scientists Tell Us”
- Assessing Climate Risk
- Thanksgiving Greeting From Dr. Fauci
- Follow Liz To Canada
- Climate Deal Reached
- “Siberia will become the greatest farming country in the world”
- New York To Flee The US For Canada
- 50% EV Sales By 2030
- Ivy League Clown Show
- Biden’s Existential Threat
- Massachusetts Saving The Planet
- France And England To Defeat Russia
- COP29 Update
- Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
Recent Comments
- jeno denuzzi on Follow Liz To Canada
- arn on “Scientists Tell Us”
- arn on “Scientists Tell Us”
- conrad ziefle on “Scientists Tell Us”
- conrad ziefle on Assessing Climate Risk
- conrad ziefle on Climate Deal Reached
- Trevor on France And England To Defeat Russia
- William on “Scientists Tell Us”
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on Follow Liz To Canada
- arn on Thanksgiving Greeting From Dr. Fauci
Models never lie…just the input parameters…
YOU *deleted* my recent posts.
No Ph.D. here is allowed!
Nobody deleted anything. Take your meds.
Steven, the integrity of science and constitutional government started to decline in 1946, before NASA was formed, when
1. Fred Hoyle published misinformation about the Sun’s origin, composition and source of energy, and
2. George Orwell moved to the forsaken Scottish Island of Jura, although dying of tuberculosis, to write “1984? and warn society about the tyrannical government that has now almost completely engulfed our planet.
http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2204
There is a ray of hope today from the US House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology:
On Wednesday 6 Mar 2013 at 10:00 am the Subcommittee on Environment will hear testimony from Drs. Judith Curry (Georgia Tech), William Chameides (Duke University), and Bjørn Lomborg (Copenhagen) on “Policy-Relevant Climate Issues in Context.”
The first and last are credible climate scientists. William Chameides is a Dean, and a member of the NAS. The hearing will be Webcast live:
http://science.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-environment-policy-relevant-climate-issues-context
I wrote to wish them success – “not just for the future of science – but also for the future of civilization !“
http://judithcurry.com/2013/03/04/forthcoming-congressional-hearing/
With deep regrets,
Oliver K. Manuel
But, there’s no worries about future funding as long as they’re within the +/-110% range:)
Ummmm… now I think about it, yes we’ve had a few big flares in the last year or five but against predictions they didn’t knock out all electronics on earth and while they were happening I didn’t even notice a flicker on the TV or more dropped cellphone calls. We’re not roasting like chickens either. So it seems that the highly paid expert scientists at NCAR know as much about what causes the weather as Madame Rue with her crystal ball and her Love Potion No. 9.
Richard Feynman said that scientists must be very clear about what they know and what they don’t know, because it’s very easy to confuse yourself. The danger is the kind of arrogance in a scientist who is so charmed by the admittedly amazing successes of modern science, that you believe you know all the answers.
If knowledge were finite and the sum of all possible knowledge would fit into a glass reaching as high as the Moon then if we measured what we’ve learned so far, the level in the glass would not even reach the ceiling of the room in which I am now.
And that is the essence of a climate change skeptic. We don’t make any predictions for warmer or cooler because we know how little we really know about all everything in the climate system.
Solar physics is not well understood either…
The consensus says that cycle 24 is a large maximum, time to Hansenize the data.
Formation of the United Nations on 24 Oct 1945 brought many benefits to society – reduction in the threat of nuclear annihilation, nationalism, racism, etc. – but hiding information on the source of energy (E) [1,2] stored as mass (m) in cores of
a.) Heavy atoms like Th, U, Pu
b.) Planets like Jupiter and Saturn
c.) Ordinary stars like our Sun
d.) Galaxies like the Milky Way
Prevented world leaders from being able to meet the basic needs of society.
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
PhD Nuclear Chemistry
Postdoc Space Physics
1. ”Neutron Repulsion”, The APEIRON Journal 19, 123-150 (2012): http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V19NO2pdf/V19N2MAN.pdf
2. “Yes, the Sun is a pulsar,” Nature (submitted 12 Dec 2012): http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10640850/Yes_the_Sun_is_a_pulsar.pdf
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/10mar_stormwarning/
How come THAT inconvenient link still exists ?