Harold Camping said that the world would be destroyed on May 21, 2012
Mayan calendar enthusiasts told us that the world would be destroyed on December 21, 2012
James Hansen told us that the world was doomed unless Obama fixed the climate before January 20, 2013.
Barack Obama told us that the economy would be destroyed on March 1, 2013 unless we gave him money.
As far as I can tell, we seemed to have survived.
It’s all a fragment of your imagination or something.
Yeah–you call this living? (Ba-DUMP-bump).
Well one is right there, AGW is nonsense and it’s the warmist imagination, err dreams fer something.
Obama isn’t finished yet. When it comes to destroying economies, he is a man of his word.
All the destruction has been delayed to coincide with the arrival of Nibiru, which is due every month depending on who you ask.
The only thing we can count on is the destruction of the dollar and the country, which are clearly underway…. if we could just figure out the timeline.
That would be the destruction of the dollar and the world’s economy – not the just the U.S.
😆
Same subject of Armageddon presented by Beppe Grillo, watch the englisch undertitled presentation from 1998 when this guy warned us for the banksters. Now as a political figure in Italy collecting almost 40 percent of the votes the EU establishment calls this guy a clown. I think he is fabulous. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-10/why-central-planners-are-so-scared-italys-beppe-grillo
If lonely the hands of power changed…
If Britain managed to get ukip’s Nigel Farage and Italy got Beppe Grillo just think of the fun they would have with the Eurocommicrats.
Oops,
change “If lonely the hands of power changed…”
to
If only the hands of power changed…
I was watching “Cosmos” while running on the treadmill when this Carl Sagan quote made me think of the whole, sorry global warming debacle and how much scientific integrity has eroded in the last 30-odd years:
“There are many hypotheses in science that are wrong. That’s perfectly alright; it’s the aperture to finding out what’s right. Science is a self-correcting process. To be accepted, new ideas must survive the most rigorous standards of evidence and scrutiny. The worst aspect of the Velikovsky affair is not that many of his ideas were wrong or silly or in gross contradiction to the facts; rather, the worst aspect is that some scientists attempted to suppress Velikovsky’s ideas. The suppression of uncomfortable ideas may be common in religion or in politics, but it is not the path to knowledge and there is no place for it in the endeavor of science. We do not know beforehand where fundamental insights will arise from about our mysterious and lovely solar system, and the history of our study of the solar system shows clearly that accepted and conventional ideas are often wrong and that fundamental insights can arise from the most unexpected sources.”