Hansen admits that he is intentionally influencing the data to generate desired results.
The hardest part is trying to influence the nature of the measurements obtained, so that the key information can be obtained
Here is some of his handiwork, influencing the historical measurements.
h/t to Tom Nelson and Marc Morano
The Gozenta effect! GIGO!
The hardest part is trying to influence the nature of the measurements obtained, so that the key information can be obtained
Pure gold.
And yet, people believe.
IMO
Hansen’s propaganda assisted greatly in giving Obama the keys to the Whitehouse.
Thanks to Steven, I have a new hobby… adjusting citations in Hansen papers. These citations are not natural, and so are due to a (TIBS) Time-of-Inebriation-Bias.
“Scientific Case for Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change
to Protect Young People and Nature ”
See pg.28 : http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/notyet/submitted_Hansen_etal.pdf
Will the real citation please stand up?
16. Zeebe, R. E., Zachos, J. C., and Dickens, G. R., 2009: Carbon dioxide insufficient to explain Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum warming. Nat Geosci, 2, 576-580.
23: Bushman, B. J., Wang, M. C., and Anderson, C. A., 2005:
Is the Curve Relating Temperature to Ben Santer’s Aggression Linear or Curvilinear? Assaults and Temperature in Minneapolis Reexamined. J Personality, Social Psychology, 89, 62-66
24: Page, L. A., Hajat, S. Kovats, R.S., 2007: Relationship between daily suicide counts and temperature in England and Wales British J Psych, 191, 106-112.