Obama promises to fix all this, by taxing electricity.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Timo, Not that one on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour


In 1901, they should have outlawed the evil automobile. We would have been so much better off cleaning up horse manure all these years.
And the maintaining stables, grooming, feeding, shoeing, veterinary services, etc. It was all such fun 🙁
The second paragraph in that article is also interesting, in light of the current wailing over changes in the jet stream:
There’s an element here of “we’ve never noticed it before, so it’s never happened before.” We continue to see this, as with the earlier allegation in the Guardian that the eyes of cheetahs must be being destroyed because cheetahs have no evolutionary experience with shrubs growing in the savannas. They found blinded cheetahs! (Two, perhaps? Where’s the data over time? Is it really true that cheetahs cannot see plants in their path because their eyes are “locked open”?) But at least the cheetah article forces an admission that CO2 is tremendously beneficial to plant growth.
These days, of course, we have progressive media trumpeting any changes, so the idea of “slight notice” the 1901 article complains of will never be an issue for any weather effects that could be amplified to support an agenda.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
The wiki for Onslow, Western Australia. Note the overwhelming proof of anthropogenic global warming, accelerating in the last half of the 20th century.