Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Peter Carroll on AI Climate Math
- dm on AI Climate Math
- dm on AI Climate Math
- Bob G on AI Climate Math
- Russell Cook on AI Climate Math
- conrad ziefle on AI Climate Math
- Billyjack on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- conrad ziefle on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Terry Shipman on AI Climate Math
Gleick Works His Digital Magic Again
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
“Tide gauges and satellites both show no sea level rise in California for decades.”
That’s why this study by Gleick was “needed.” And Scott Mandia is a tool.
A tool with super powers……..I mean hip boots and a hockey stick.
why would an agw prof need graphs produced by a fantasist?
I resent that remark!
Tide gauges show about 0.7 mm/yr sea level rise for the California coast.
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/
Since 1980, they show none.
I do hate it when I make stupid errors such as forgetting the dollar sign “$” for denoting absolute values on a simple Excel spreadsheet.
You’re right, I picked 8 representative tide gauge stations north to south down the California coast and averaged up the slope and when I do it right, it comes out to minus -0.04 mm/yr.
Satellites show the same thing.
Steve, Steve Steve, you haven’t adjusted for the PDO, the last few La Nina’s, then it has to be GIA corrected, and you should then smooth out the last couple of decades using a carefully selected start and end point. Once you do that, you’ll see that we’re all doomed. Gleick is prophet.
Steve, that was an excellent reply to the climate kook!
My favorite is the crooks at Scripps in La Jolla whining about sea level rise. They can see The Cove out their window – where there has been no change in sea level for 140 years.