Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
Recent Comments
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Billyjack on An Inconvenient Truth
- arn on Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- D. Boss on Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- conrad ziefle on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- dearieme on Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- Gamecock on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Francis Barnett on Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- conrad ziefle on Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
Gleick Works His Digital Magic Again
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
“Tide gauges and satellites both show no sea level rise in California for decades.”
That’s why this study by Gleick was “needed.” And Scott Mandia is a tool.
A tool with super powers……..I mean hip boots and a hockey stick.
why would an agw prof need graphs produced by a fantasist?
I resent that remark!
Tide gauges show about 0.7 mm/yr sea level rise for the California coast.
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/
Since 1980, they show none.
I do hate it when I make stupid errors such as forgetting the dollar sign “$” for denoting absolute values on a simple Excel spreadsheet.
You’re right, I picked 8 representative tide gauge stations north to south down the California coast and averaged up the slope and when I do it right, it comes out to minus -0.04 mm/yr.
Satellites show the same thing.
Steve, Steve Steve, you haven’t adjusted for the PDO, the last few La Nina’s, then it has to be GIA corrected, and you should then smooth out the last couple of decades using a carefully selected start and end point. Once you do that, you’ll see that we’re all doomed. Gleick is prophet.
Steve, that was an excellent reply to the climate kook!
My favorite is the crooks at Scripps in La Jolla whining about sea level rise. They can see The Cove out their window – where there has been no change in sea level for 140 years.