Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
Gleick Works His Digital Magic Again
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
“Tide gauges and satellites both show no sea level rise in California for decades.”
That’s why this study by Gleick was “needed.” And Scott Mandia is a tool.
A tool with super powers……..I mean hip boots and a hockey stick.
why would an agw prof need graphs produced by a fantasist?
I resent that remark!
Tide gauges show about 0.7 mm/yr sea level rise for the California coast.
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/
Since 1980, they show none.
I do hate it when I make stupid errors such as forgetting the dollar sign “$” for denoting absolute values on a simple Excel spreadsheet.
You’re right, I picked 8 representative tide gauge stations north to south down the California coast and averaged up the slope and when I do it right, it comes out to minus -0.04 mm/yr.
Satellites show the same thing.
Steve, Steve Steve, you haven’t adjusted for the PDO, the last few La Nina’s, then it has to be GIA corrected, and you should then smooth out the last couple of decades using a carefully selected start and end point. Once you do that, you’ll see that we’re all doomed. Gleick is prophet.
Steve, that was an excellent reply to the climate kook!
My favorite is the crooks at Scripps in La Jolla whining about sea level rise. They can see The Cove out their window – where there has been no change in sea level for 140 years.