Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
Recent Comments
- arn on “what the science shows”
- Bob G on Causes Of Earthquakes
- Bob G on “what the science shows”
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Tel on “what the science shows”
- Solar Mutant Ninjaneer on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on Precision Taxation
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Earthquakes
- conrad ziefle on “what the science shows”
Gleick Works His Digital Magic Again
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
“Tide gauges and satellites both show no sea level rise in California for decades.”
That’s why this study by Gleick was “needed.” And Scott Mandia is a tool.
A tool with super powers……..I mean hip boots and a hockey stick.
why would an agw prof need graphs produced by a fantasist?
I resent that remark!
Tide gauges show about 0.7 mm/yr sea level rise for the California coast.
http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/
Since 1980, they show none.
I do hate it when I make stupid errors such as forgetting the dollar sign “$” for denoting absolute values on a simple Excel spreadsheet.
You’re right, I picked 8 representative tide gauge stations north to south down the California coast and averaged up the slope and when I do it right, it comes out to minus -0.04 mm/yr.
Satellites show the same thing.
Steve, Steve Steve, you haven’t adjusted for the PDO, the last few La Nina’s, then it has to be GIA corrected, and you should then smooth out the last couple of decades using a carefully selected start and end point. Once you do that, you’ll see that we’re all doomed. Gleick is prophet.
Steve, that was an excellent reply to the climate kook!
My favorite is the crooks at Scripps in La Jolla whining about sea level rise. They can see The Cove out their window – where there has been no change in sea level for 140 years.